3
$\begingroup$

What is the physical meaning when we have an empirical formula with fractional subscripts such as $\ce{LiMn_{1-x}Fe_{x}PO4}$ $(0 \le x \le 1)$?

This an example of the paper the notation above is used:

Bai, J.; Hong, J.; Chen, H.; Graetz, J.; Wang, F. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119 (5), 2266–2276. DOI 10.1021/jp508600u.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

These indicate "doping" or non-stoichiometric compounds.

In this case, there's some fraction of Fe, and some fraction of Mn in a lithium iron phosphate battery. If I remember correctly, you need to dope a different ion to increase the conductivity of $\ce{LiFePO4}$.

See also here: How are non-Stoichiometric compounds determined?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I think it is a bit more than that: the nomenclature here is used when the ($Mn$,$Fe$) site in the lattice is fully occupied, and $x$ is telling you how many have $Fe$ vs $Mn$ in the sample. This is indicating that there is a single phase across $LiMnPO_4$ to $LiFePO_4$, trading out $Mn$ for $Fe$. Non-stoichiometry ($Mn$+$Fe$ isn't 1) would be indicated by a $\delta$. If $Mn$ did not substitute perfectly for $Fe$, it might be shown as $LiMn_{1-x-\delta}Fe_{x}PO_4$. $\endgroup$ – Jon Custer Oct 6 '14 at 22:51
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that's a useful clarification. I agree that in this particular case, there's a single phase and x vs. 1-x is giving you a ratio of $\ce{Fe}$ to $\ce{Mn}$ in this compound. However, I think most people would consider this case as a part of the broader subset of non-stoichometry, since there's no simple integer to define the formula. The OP's title question referred to the general question of fractional subscripts, which does go to non-stoichiometry. $\endgroup$ – Geoff Hutchison Oct 7 '14 at 1:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.