Pyrene doesn't seem to be aromatic. However, sources claim that it is aromatic.
Lewis structure of pyrene


  1. Pyrene is cyclic. ✓
  2. Pyrene is flat (planar). ✓
  3. Pyrene has 16 π electrons.
  4. Every atom in the ring structure of pyrene is $\ce{sp^2}$ hybridized. ✓

The problem is that pyrene fails the $4n+2$ rule. $4n + 2 \neq 16$ where $n$ is an integer.

Something leads me to suspect that Hückel's rule is an oversimplification here. Or is pyrene indeed non-aromatic?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ while pyrene is formally aromatic (i.e. has ring current), it reacts mostly like diene with isolated double bonds. $\endgroup$
    – permeakra
    Commented Sep 22, 2014 at 7:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I guess the better defining characteristic of an aromatic compound is its response to the magnetic field which is used in NMR spectroscopy. If a compound produces an aromatic ring current as a result of induction due to the applied magnetic field, then it can be categorised as aromatic. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 18, 2019 at 9:22

4 Answers 4


Pyrene is aromatic. The Hückel $4n+2$ rule works best with monocyclic ring systems. If you look at the following resonance structure for pyrene with a central double bond, the monocyclic periphery has 14 π electrons (ignoring the greyed-out central double bond), but that is a rationalization.

Periphery of pyrene

Nonetheless, pyrene undergoes reactions characteristic of aromatic systems and has ring currents expected from aromatic systems.

  • $\begingroup$ Is that implying that the conjugated pi system does not involve the central double bond? @ron $\endgroup$
    – Dissenter
    Commented Sep 22, 2014 at 0:41
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Correct, in other words, pyrene becomes 14-annulene. But as I said above, this is an after the fact rationalization. The 4n+2 rule was really meant to apply to monocyclic pi systems. You run into problems when it is extended beyond its originally intended use. $\endgroup$
    – ron
    Commented Sep 22, 2014 at 0:47
  • $\begingroup$ What if you drew resonance structures? The central bond then vanishes. $\endgroup$
    – vs_292
    Commented Dec 28, 2017 at 9:46

To clarify @ron's point, the general "cheminformatics" rule for deducing aromatic fused-ring systems is whether there is one path (usually the peripheral one) that satisfies $4n+2$:

So for naphthalene:


The bold bonds give you a ring path of $\mathrm{sp^2}$ carbons with 10 π electrons, so it's aromatic. There are some arguments about whether the central bond is aromatic or not. (I say baloney, but it's fair to say aromaticity generates lots of arguments.)


So yes, the bold path gives you 14 π electrons for a $4n+2$ path. Again, I've heard people say the central two carbons aren't aromatic. (IIRC, the $\ce{^13C}$ NMR disagrees.)

I wrote the code for Open Babel and aside from some tricky nitrogen-heteroaromatic rings, this rule generally matches chemical reality. (Setting aside the question of the interior carbons.)

I think another fairly safe rule is "if a fused aromatic system is made up of individually aromatic rings, aromaticity is retained."

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What's the debate about the central bond? $\endgroup$
    – Dissenter
    Commented Sep 22, 2014 at 0:54
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Dissenter it's outside the mainstream of chemistry, but since including the central bond would make 16 $\pi$ electrons, some cheminformatics people question of that bond is truly "in" the aromatic system. As I said above, I think it's baloney - most experimental or computational definitions of aromaticity would indicate aromatic carbons there. Some people are just too tied to Hückel - but ask them about $\ce{C60}$. Heh. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 22, 2014 at 0:57
  • $\begingroup$ C60 is aromatic? @GeoffHutchinson $\endgroup$
    – Dissenter
    Commented Sep 22, 2014 at 0:57
  • $\begingroup$ I'd say so, but that's a whole different debate. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 22, 2014 at 1:00
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ I absolutely love the statement you give in the comment and I am herewith encouraging you to include it into your answer. I believe, that there is a pretty common misconceptions, that only Hückel aromats are actually aromatic systems. But you are of course right, aromaticity generates a lot of arguments. $\endgroup$ Commented May 18, 2015 at 4:20

While the previous answers are correct in indicating that pyrene has aromaticity, they are often correct for the wrong reason. The proper way to break down the aromaticity in pyrene is to make the most Clar sextets possible. Clar sextexts are sets of six electrons that are cyclically delocalized. There are two unique ways to draw the Clar sextets in pyrene.

Pyrene Clar sextets Alternative pyrene Clar sextets

The first drawing shows two Clar sextets, while the second only has one, and thus should be less favored. If we perform NICS computations to determine where the delocalization happens, we see more delocalization in rings A and D than in rings B and C.

This can be further expanded to other systems such as pentacene, which shows a much lower singlet triplet gap than many other organic molecules thanks to the triplet having two stabilizing Clar sextets.

Pentacene Clar sextets Triplet pentacene Clar sextets

For a more complete description of Clar sextets and aromaticity, I would recommend an article by Portella et al.1 Also, as others have mentioned, when moving to 3D, things can get weird.

  1. Portella, G.; Poater, J.; Solà, M. Assessment of clar’s aromatic π-sextet rule by means of PDI, NICS and HOMA indicators of local aromaticity. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2005, 18 (8), 785–791. DOI: 10.1002/poc.938.
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I realized in my answer that I didn't give my stock comment about "many definitions of aromaticity." I do like Clar's sextets with aromatic hydrocarbons. My one problem is that when I've brought them up in classes, it reinforces the false connection between "benzene" and aromaticity. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 21, 2015 at 1:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nice, but can Mr. Clar do his sextets in cyclooctateraenediide? $\endgroup$
    – mykhal
    Commented Nov 9, 2018 at 13:49

According to Wikipedia:

Hückel's rule is not valid for many compounds containing more than three fused aromatic nuclei in a cyclic fashion. For example, pyrene contains 16 conjugated electrons (8 bonds), and coronene contains 24 conjugated electrons (12 bonds). Both of these polycyclic molecules are aromatic, even though they fail the 4n+2 rule. Indeed, Hückel's rule can only be theoretically justified for monocyclic systems.


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.