2
$\begingroup$

I was wondering about the amazing conductive properties of graphene, lets assume a large copper bar that is 10 kg, current of 1kA and probably more can flow in it, what about graphene? It certainly can since its a better conductor, but it would be much lighter? In the milligrams possibly?

Also, can graphene replace the heavy busbars that carry MW of power? Making it much lighter?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Currently Aluminum is the next best conductor to copper, when it comes to bang for the buck; but aluminum is only 61% as efficient at conductivity as copper is, making it less desirable. The weight of aluminum and its low cost are big plusses when compared to copper. What do you suppose you'd have to do to augment aluminum with graphene in order to increase it's conductivity, while keeping its low-weight and flexibility. If you could do that, you could revolutionize the power transmission industry, saving us all a ton of money. $\endgroup$ – user36022 Oct 13 '16 at 22:38
11
$\begingroup$

The trick with graphene is that a lot of its amazing properties only work when you have continuous perfect sheets of it, and making graphene like this is currently beyond us, for large scales anyways. It is true that graphene has very high electron mobility $\approx10^{5}~\mathrm{cm^2/Vs}$ at room temperature, which works out to on the order of $10~\mathrm{n\Omega\cdot m}$ in bulk (which assumes you can make a perfect multilayer structure that maintains the properties of a single sheet). An impressive figure, but only $\approx40\%$ better than copper.

Of course, copper is about 6 times more dense than graphene, so if mass is the main concern, graphene would be a pretty good improvement. Still, we're not talking about replacing $10~\mathrm{kg}$ of copper with a few milligrams. Given how much cheaper and easier it is to make metal wires, we're not at the point of using graphene for this kind of bulk application. There are also some more mundane problems to sort out, e.g. graphene is brittle like a ceramic, which might cause mechanical issues.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I hope this amazing materials get to be more available in the near future, there are some discoveries that helps its mass production. I hope it can replace copper quite soon! When it's improved of course. $\endgroup$ – Pupil Sep 3 '14 at 22:55
  • $\begingroup$ These things are always hard to predict, but I'm guessing that we'll see smaller scale electronic applications first—replacing ITO in touchscreens and the like. When we can make long runs with multiple layers, then maybe we can have the power transmission stuff, along with space elevators and other cool stuff. I hope I'm around to see them! $\endgroup$ – Michael DM Dryden Sep 3 '14 at 23:44
  • $\begingroup$ Hopefully, you and I both! $\endgroup$ – Pupil Sep 5 '14 at 1:18
  • $\begingroup$ Michael, to get an idea of how graphene is better than copper, if a copper conductor can carry 1kA continuously a graphene conductor could carry x1000 times that amount? I'm trying to grasp how good is graphene's conductivity vs copper and silicon. $\endgroup$ – Pupil Dec 1 '14 at 19:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's certainly an impressive number, but you have to be careful using it in comparison with other materials. Because the failure mode when conductors carry current is generally a thermal effect, the current capacity has a lot to do with how well the conductor can lose heat. A small wire has a much larger surface area to volume ratio than a large one and takes more current to heat. I expect graphene would fare better than copper of the same shape, but be careful extrapolating these numbers to macroscopic wires. For something big like a bus-bar, the current capacity may well be 5 orders smaller. $\endgroup$ – Michael DM Dryden Dec 2 '14 at 7:04
0
$\begingroup$

Stanene is strictly theoretical at this point as was the theoretical hardest substance C3N4 for many years ($\ce{C3N4}$ is extremely expensive and produced in very small quantities in research laboratories - a lot like antimatter). Graphene is 1.4 times as conductive as copper by volume, but if you factor in density, it is 5.8 times more conductive (if a given sample of copper can carry $\pu{1kA}$ with a $\pu{1V}$ drop in voltage, the same weight, and length, of graphene, could carry $\pu{5.8 kA}$ with with a $\pu{1V}$ drop in voltage - in theory). Of course, fabrication methods can degrade this. For electrical power transmission, which depends a lot on weight, $\ce{Al}$ is 2 times as conductive as copper BY WEIGHT and is, therefore, the current choice for power transmission. The fact that it costs less is a bonus. A graphene/$\ce{Al}$ alloy might give a conductor with the fracture resistance near $\ce{Al}$ but better conductivity. This is an active area of research currently.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.