Since OP did not give any reference to the rearrangement in the question, I doubted the formation of aniline is true even if as a minor product. The conversion of $\alpha$-hydroxy amides to corresponding aldehydes is a well-known degradation reaction, commonly known as Weerman degradation:
$$\ce{R-CH(OH)-C=O-NH2 ->[NaOBr][\Delta] RCHO + H2NCO2H}$$
Although this degradation is independently discovered (Ref.1), Some authors have regarded it as an extension of the Hofmann rearrangement (Ref.2) because of the similarity in proposed mechanism:

Accordingly, to my knowledge, there is no place to have an rearrangement other than proposed. However, even if it is most unlikely, there could be a possibility to have 1,3-phenyl shift at the intermediate $\bf{I}$ stage:

The resultant phenyl $\alpha$-ketoamide could undergoes base hydrolysis under the reaction condition to give aniline.
Note: The 1,3-phenyl shift has been known for other reactions (Ref.3).
References:
- R. A. Weerman, "Sur une synthèse d'aldéhydes et de l'indol," Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas et de la Belgique 1910, 29(1-2), 18-21 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/recl.19100290104).
- C. L. Arcus and D. B. Greenwood, "398. The Hofmann reaction with α- and β-hydroxy-amides: reactions of the intermediate isocyanates," J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 1937-1940 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/JR9530001937).
- Colin Eaborn, Karen L. Jones, Paul D. Lickiss, and Włodzimierz A. Stańczyk, "Proportion of 1,3-phenyl migration in trifluoroethanolysis, methanolysis, and hydrolysis of $\ce{(Me3Si)2C(SiMe2Ph)(SiEt2I)}$," J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1993, (3), 395-397 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/P29930000395).