0
$\begingroup$

In chemical kinetics, we use rate law to find the instantaneous rate of reaction.

Let us consider a simple reaction

$$\ce{aA + bB -> products}$$

where the rate law is

$$\mathrm{rate} = k[\ce{A}]^a[\ce{B}]^b$$

I think that the rate constant tells us about the effectiveness of collisions for the reaction at a particular temperature; and the concentration terms raised to the powers of stoichiometric coefficients represents the total number of collisions.

Is my reasoning correct? If not, what is the correct explanation?

$\endgroup$
10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Sounds about right. Then again, reactions are rarely simple, and the actual rate law might differ from $k[A]^a[b]^b$, but that's another story. $\endgroup$ Jul 7 at 11:56
  • $\begingroup$ @IvanNeretin I am not sure how concentration terms raised to the powers of stoichiometric coefficients represents the total number of collisions, could you please prove some mathematical approach to figure this out. Also, I know about the complex reaction and how it differs but I want to know the basic idea behind the rate law thus assuming it is a simple reaction. Thanks for your clarification. $\endgroup$
    – Zecron
    Jul 7 at 16:18
  • $\begingroup$ Rate laws such as this only show how many reactant species are needed to produce the product according to mass balance. They tell us nothing about how the reaction actually happens. The actual mechanism for any reaction has to be determined by experiment. You can imagine that if, say, $a=b=2$ the chance of four solute species coming together at the same small instance and in the same place is so absolutely tiny, that it just does not happen. What tends to happen is that two species form an intermediate and this reacts again and so on. (There are whole books on this topic) $\endgroup$
    – porphyrin
    Jul 7 at 16:28
  • $\begingroup$ @porphyrin Thanks for your answer. $\endgroup$
    – Zecron
    Jul 7 at 18:07
  • $\begingroup$ @RodrigodeAzevedo Because it works but I am unable to understand how? $\endgroup$
    – Zecron
    Jul 8 at 13:50
0
$\begingroup$

Try examining the Arrhenius Equation and see if that gives you more information about the rate constant.

In general, the rate of reaction (in terms of the reactants) is a function of how many successful collisions occur per unit time. There are also unsuccessful collisions. You can also write the rate of reaction in terms of the products. Since the products are not always 1:1 with the reactants, this wouldn't necessarily equate to the number of successful collisions.

In gas phase reactions, inert species can influence the rate of reaction. Since they aren't colliding with the reactants to form the products, the concentrations can't always be equal to the number of collisions.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks but need a more clear explanation $\endgroup$
    – Zecron
    Jul 8 at 4:03
  • $\begingroup$ Your reasoning is not correct. The concentration terms raised to the powers of stoichiometric coefficients do not represent the total number of collisions. An inert species does not participate in the reaction but can be included in the rate law. Therefore, the concentrations raised to the stochiometric coefficient can't possibly represent the number of collisions. I think you are on the right track with the rate constant. You should read about and examine the Arrhenius Equation, I think this may give you more insight about the rate constant. $\endgroup$
    – rpm10
    Jul 8 at 4:39
  • $\begingroup$ Refer to this article from chem.libretexts.org for more information about collision theory. $\endgroup$
    – rpm10
    Jul 8 at 4:57
  • $\begingroup$ I got the concept with the rate constant but can't understand what concentration term really means. $\endgroup$
    – Zecron
    Jul 8 at 14:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.