2
$\begingroup$

The question is:

What is the molecular weight of the final product? $$\ce{Ph3C-Cl ->[NaCN] P1 ->[H3O+] P2 ->[Conc H2SO4][CH3OH]P3}$$

My products were:

$\mathrm P_1$ = $\ce{Ph3C-CN}$ (by SN); $\mathrm P_2$ = $\ce{Ph3C-COOH}$ (by hydrolysis); $\mathrm P_3$ = $\ce{Ph3C-COOCH3}$ (By esterification)

If this was correct, the answer should have been 302. But the correct answer is 274. What did I do wrong?

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ Your answer looks correct to me. The "official" answer looks to be in error $\endgroup$
    – Waylander
    Jun 4, 2021 at 7:08
  • $\begingroup$ @Waylander, However, is the first step feasible? I was unable to find literature referencing the reaction between trityl chloride and sodium cyanide. Any preparation of triphenyl acetonitrile involved copper cyanide. $\endgroup$ Jun 4, 2021 at 7:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ BTW I’ll get some hint (or solution) tomorrow. I’ll be sure to share it here. $\endgroup$
    – WhySee
    Jun 4, 2021 at 9:06
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ 274 corresponds to 3 phenyls + C + 31. 31 = 16 (O) + 15 (CH3). So it looks like if CN goes on, it comes off because Ph3C+ is so stable, but in conc H2SO4 - probably adjusted carefully - OCH3 can go on, while the H2O produced reduces the acidity of the H2SO4 somewhat. But I just played with the numbers. $\endgroup$ Jun 4, 2021 at 13:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So are we proposing that P2 is triphenylacetic acid and it undeergoes an acid catalysed decarboxylation? $\endgroup$
    – Waylander
    Jun 4, 2021 at 15:08

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

You are correct in your first two steps. Cyanide adds to trityl chloride to give triphenylacetonitrile which is then hydrolysed in aqueous acid to triphenylacetic acid. In $\ce{H2SO4/MeOH}$ the acid is protonated and loses water to give the acylium cation ($\ce{Ph3C-CO+}$). This cation loses $\ce{CO}$ to give the very stable trityl cation ($\ce{Ph3C+}$) which is eventually captured by $\ce{MeOH}$ to give trityl methyl ether.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Wow. This is actually the correct explanation. I just confirmed today. Thanks. $\endgroup$
    – WhySee
    Jun 5, 2021 at 3:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.