A German speaking mineral atlas states:
«Man unterscheidet die verschiedenen polymorphen Modifikationen durch
Voranstellen der griechischen Buchstaben alpha, beta, gamma usw. Die
Buchstaben entsprechen im Wesentlichen der Erhöhung oder Erniedrigung
der Umwandlungstemperatur.»
which may be translated into
«One discerns the different polymorphs by Greek letters $\alpha$, $\beta$,
$\gamma$, etc. The letters mainly correspond to an increase or
decrease of the [solid-solid] phase transition.»
To extend the answer by @ĐỨc Lê Hồng
(+1):
Eilhard Mitscherlich may be credited to extend Steno's angle law about crystals of one and the same compound to isomorphism (different chemical compounds may yield crystals of at least very similar shape) and eventually allotropes (about elements) / polymorphism (the term equally applicable for compounds) that the same chemical compound may form crystals of distinct different shape and symmetry.
Back around 1825, the experimentally accessible space in terms of temperature and especially pressure was much more constraint, than today. Thus, the phases were sort in ascending order of the temperature of the corresponding phase transition by Greek letters.
This is the reason why e.g., while the stable form of tin observed at room temperature is labeled by $\beta$, and the one at lower temperatures by $\alpha$. Staying with elements, cyclic $\ce{S8}$ sulfur is known in the $\alpha$ form stable below $\ce{95.3 ^\circ{}C}$, but by the $\beta$ and $\gamma$ form above this temperature. Without counting the other allotropes of sulfur. (reference).
Iron is an example suitable to to show early limitations of this nomenclature. The phase diagram of pure iron still is simple for its $\alpha$, $\gamma$, and $\delta$ form.
(credit)
(There equally is a $\beta$ form of Fe, but this is of much lesser significance, seen in the binary phase diagram Fe-C.)
Today's convention to count polymorphs by roman numbers (if there is more than one) has the advantage that these may reflect the sequence of their discovery, regardless if researchers explore the variation of temperature, pressure, or the combination of the two. An example for this may be water:
(figure 7 from here, figure 2 from here, both open access)
On occasion, you encounter binary phase diagrams reflecting both approaches, e.g., Fe-C:
(credit)
describing ledeburite I (a micro structure of austenit + $\ce{Fe3C}$) and ledeburite II (a microstructure of Perlit + $\ce{Fe3C}$).