Why is the electron configuration of $\ce{Co^+}$ $[\ce{Ar}](\mathrm{3d})^8$?

Since neutral $\ce{Co}$ itself has a $[\ce{Ar}](\mathrm{4s})^2(\mathrm{3d})^7$ configuration, wouldn't the ionised electron be lost from the $\mathrm{4s}$ orbital, leading to an electron configuration of $[\ce{Ar}](\mathrm{4s})^1(\mathrm{3d})^7$?


For lighter elements, the shells fill in order. Starting at the transition metals, an outer s orbital may fill before an inner d orbital, so the electron configuration of unioninzed cobalt is written $\ce{[Ar]}4\mathrm s^1\,3\mathrm d^7$, rather than $\ce{[Ar]}3\mathrm d^7\,4\mathrm s^1$.

There is a video diagramming the electron configuration of $\ce{Co}$, $\ce{Co^{2+}}$ and $\ce{Co^{3+}}$, thought it does not explain the reasoning, nor does it cover the less common $\ce{Co^{+}}$ ion, produced by photoionization or as found in some esoteric metal-organic compounds, or in the theoretical $\ce{CoCl}$.

That said, the situation becomes murky for transition elements, and downright turbid for lanthanides and actinides, where f orbitals are added. For example the outermost shells of $\ce{La, Ce and Pr}$ are $\ce5\mathrm d^1\,$, then $\ce4\mathrm f^1\,5\mathrm d^1$, and then $\ce4\mathrm f3$. What happened to the Pr d electron? My understanding is that energy levels are quite close for the larger outer shells, and it is not intuitive which orbital fills first.

  • $\begingroup$ I have always been under the impression that for transition metals, 3d < 4s in energy. The $3d^8$ configuration of Co(I) ion is thus the norm, and it's the $4s^2 3d^{n-2)}$ configuration of neutral atoms that is the exception. Also, what exactly is the energetic drawback of having an incomplete orbital? Exchange energy only really plays a crucial role in the d5 and d10 case; it's always there for d6/d7/d8/d9, of course, but isn't large enough to affect the electron configuration. $\endgroup$ – orthocresol May 2 at 1:37
  • $\begingroup$ I'm probably wrong about the 3d/4s thing, though, sorry. cf. references in chemistry.stackexchange.com/a/33310/16683. I think I should probably do some research before commenting on that. $\endgroup$ – orthocresol May 2 at 1:39
  • $\begingroup$ What is it meant by 'has no incomplete orbital'. Are there not 2 half-filled orbitals in a $\ce{d^8}$ configuration? $\endgroup$ – M.L May 2 at 3:03
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, @M.L, my mind must have been wandering. Max numbers are, of course, s2, p6, and d10. The answer will be corrected. $\endgroup$ – DrMoishe Pippik May 2 at 19:31
  • $\begingroup$ So there is now way once can predict the configuration of transition metals, lanthanides, actinides ions? $\endgroup$ – jukam May 3 at 14:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.