0
$\begingroup$

Consider the following radioactive decay:

$\ce{A\rightarrow B\rightarrow C}$

In my textbook, it is written that radioactive equilibrium is when rate of formation of $\ce{B}$ is equal to rate of disappearence of $\ce{B}$. In my textbook, it is also written that when the net formation of $\ce{B}$ is zero, we say that the system is in transient equilibrium i.e. $\frac{dB_{N}}{dt}=0$ where $B_{N}$ is the number of atoms of $\ce{B}$ at time $t$. Now, $\frac{dB_{N}}{dt}=0$ means that the rate of formation of $\ce{B}$ is equal to the rate of disappearance of $\ce{B}$ which is exactly what radioactive equilibrium is. Then, what is the difference between radioactive equilibrium and transient equilibrium? Is there even any difference between them? Pleas explain. I am confused.

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

I guess you have been caught in a semantic trap. Adjectives radioactive and transient describe two different aspects of the same thing.

It could be as well written as "radioactive transient equilibrium". Or, even better as "radioactive steady state", as it is not true equilibrium.

Radioactive describes its nature . It may not be radioactive,by can be thermal, chemical, radiative, mechanical etc .

Transient describes its dynamics. It need not to be transient ( temporary, also called a steady state ), but it can be a permanent, timeless, true equilibrium.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Are steady state and transient state the same thing @Poutnik? @Poutnik please answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 25, 2021 at 14:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As it is already said in 2 different ways in the answer, answering it for the third time can be considered excessive. $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Apr 25, 2021 at 14:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.