I'm having trouble wrapping my head around Kohlrausch law of infinite dilution and molar conductivities in general.

For a salt $\ce{AB}$ the molar conductivity at infinite dilution can be expressed as the sum of molar conductivities at infinite dilution of the respective elements.

$$\Lambda^\circ_\mathrm{m}(\ce{AB}) = \Lambda^\circ_\mathrm{m}(\ce{A^+}) + \Lambda^\circ_\mathrm{m}(\ce{B^-})$$

But I don't get how the conductivities of $\ce{A^+}$ and $\ce{B^-}$ can be different.

I thought it means that the ions take different times to reach the electrodes so there should be, let's say, greater movement of $\ce{A^+}$ towards the electrodes so as time passes there should be more negative charge due to $\ce{B^-}$ accumulating in the solution. That's obviously incorrect.

So what exactly does conductivity signify physically if not different rates of migration?

  • $\begingroup$ Charge never (or almost never) accumulates in solution. It would be extremely unfavorable. If say A+ had a higher molar conductivity than B-, then A+ ions would carry most of the charge in the bulk solution. B- ions would still be consumed at the anode. The difference in conductivities would probably result in different amounts of "concentration polarization", i.e. the thickness of the boundary layer of concentrations very very (100s of nm) near the electrode surfaces would be different. $\endgroup$
    – Curt F.
    Commented Mar 31, 2021 at 0:13
  • $\begingroup$ @CurtF. "A$^+$ ions would carry most of the charge in the bulk solution. B − ions woukd still be consumed at the anode"-Could you elaborate please? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 1, 2021 at 10:54

1 Answer 1


You are completely right that ions migrate at different rates, and the relative rates can be quantified by a property of the electrolyte called the transport number, which is the fraction of the current that can be accounted by one of the ions:

$$t_\circ^+ = \frac{\Lambda_\mathrm{m}^\circ(\ce{A+})}{\Lambda_\mathrm{m}^\circ(\ce{A+})+\Lambda_\mathrm{m}^\circ(\ce{B-})}$$ $$t_\circ^- = \frac{\Lambda_\mathrm{m}^\circ(\ce{B-})}{\Lambda_\mathrm{m}^\circ(\ce{A+})+\Lambda_\mathrm{m}^\circ(\ce{B-})}$$

(here $t_\circ^i$ designates a limiting transport number ie one in the limit of dilute electrolyte solution).

In the early days of the study of electrolytes, Hittorf developed a way of determining the ratio of transport numbers by measuring the concentrations of electrolytes in different parts of an electrolytic cell. Say the cell contains a cathode, an anode, and a bridging chamber. Cations are attracted toward the cathode chamber and depleted at the cathode, and anions are similarly depleted at the anode but also migrate into the anode chamber. The change in the concentration of cations in the cathode chamber is therefore proportional to the current at the electrode minus the fraction of current carried by cations replenishing the cation chamber:

$$\begin{align} \frac{dc_+}{dt} &= \frac{I_+}{z_+F} - \frac{I}{z_+F} \\ &= \frac{(t_+-1)I}{z_+F} \\ &= \frac{-t_-I}{z_+F} \end{align}$$

A similar equation can be written for the anions. The resulting concentrations in the chambers can be related to the migration rates $v_i$ of the ions , which can in turn be related to the transport numbers as

$$\frac{t^+}{t^-} = \frac{|Z^+v^+|}{|Z^+v^-|}$$

Therefore from measurement of electrolyte concentrations in different parts of a cell it is possible to deduce the relative molar conductivities of the components of an electrolyte.

Because the counterions have different mobilities a concentration gradient will develop and this leads to a liquid junction potential. This results in a voltage drop within the cell that counters the EMF, such that the measured cell potential is not the ideal EMF. In Hittorf's experiment this is not a problem. Where it is a problem it might be avoided by using a salt bridge.

For a textbook that provides a reasonably clear introduction to electrochemistry see Atkins Physical Chemistry, from which I derived some of this answer.

Transport numbers are important in practical applications. See for instance Ref. 1 for an interesting thesis that focuses on the determination of transport numbers in cements.


  1. J.A. Muka (1992). Transport Number Determination by Analysis of Transport of Aqueous Electrolytes Through Cementitious Materials Using Emf Method. University of Nairobi.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.