We learn about indicators but these seem awfully useless if you have no clue what pH the color change occurs at. How did early chemists figure this out? I guess more broadly, how was the hydronium content even measured in the first place?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Voltage of electrochemical cells whose reactions involved protons $\endgroup$
    – Andrew
    Feb 19, 2021 at 21:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The wikipedia article on S. P. L. Sørensen is a good starting point and references the original literature, babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/… $\endgroup$
    – Karsten
    Feb 19, 2021 at 22:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For future reference: Questions about historical aspects of chemistry can also be a good fit for History of Science and Mathematics Stackexchange. $\endgroup$
    – njuffa
    Feb 20, 2021 at 5:20

1 Answer 1


"Hydronium" content can be easily determined by simple acid base titration. Keep in mind that there is nothing fundamental about pH. It is just a convenient scale for expressing hydrogen ion concentration. For example, a kilogram is a recent invention for expressing mass measurement, it does not mean that ancient people did not weigh anything before kilogram was known.

In the same way, acid-base titration is more than 300 years old, with litmus among the earliest indicators. pH is a relatively new concept. Of course, the titrations were not analytically precise and accurate 300 years ago.

Historically, the simplest way to do acid base titration was to use potash (naturally occurring mineral $\ce{K2CO3}$). One could continue titration until the evolution of bubbles stopped.* No indicator needed. This is the way vinegars were assessed. Note that in those time moles, molarity, did not exist. There was the concept of equivalent weights, i.e., this weight of X will react this that weight of Y completely. The concept of equivalents is still taught in some countries, although it has vanished from Western curricula.

Kolthoff (father of modern analysis) has written books on acid base indicators. Check internet archive. Your question is worth an entire essay.

*From Bishop, Indicators: International Series of Monographs in Analytical Chemistry

  • $\begingroup$ fizzy titration! :-) $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Feb 20, 2021 at 11:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @uhoh, carbonate titration is still considered among the standard ones. Amazing that some processes are still too good. $\endgroup$
    – AChem
    Feb 20, 2021 at 16:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.