# Exergonic vs Endergonic Reactions

### Problem

Problem 3, concept check 8.2 from Campbell Biology [1, p. 150]:

Some partygoers wear glow-in-the-dark necklaces that start glowing once they are “activated” by snapping the necklace. This allows two chemicals to react and emit light in the form of chemiluminescence. Is the reaction exergonic or endergonic? Explain.

The reaction is exergonic because it releases energy—in this case, in the form of light. (This is a nonbiological version of the bioluminescence seen in Figure 8.1.)

From [1, p. 143]:

Figure 8.1 The green glowing spots on the outside of this Brazilian termite mound are larvae of the click beetle, Pyrophorus nyctophanus. These larvae convert the energy stored in organic molecules to light, a process called bioluminescence, which attracts termites that the larvae eat. Bioluminescence and other metabolic activities in a cell are energy transformations that are subject to physical laws.

### Question

The answer is an exergonic reaction. What I understand of an exergonic reaction is that not only does it have a negative $$ΔG,$$ it releases energy. In this case, the energy released is light energy.

My original answer endergonic reaction as for the problem given, to “activate” the necklace, doesn’t it require energy from partygoers to snap the necklace? Is the $$ΔG$$ value for the light being released much less than the $$ΔG$$ value of the energy being used to snap the necklace?

### Reference

1. Urry, L. A.; Cain, M. L.; Wasserman, S. A.; Minorsky, P. V.; Orr, R. B.; Campbell, N. A. Campbell Biology, 12th ed.; Pearson: New York, NY, 2020. ISBN 978-0-13-518874-3.
• I suspect the "snapping" is just to break a physical barrier that separates the reacting chemicals, rather than the provision of an activation energy for the reaction itself. You wouldn't call a reaction endergonic just because (for example) it required energy for you to mix the two reactants together in the same beaker. – orthocresol Dec 2 '20 at 20:57
• Consider a ball on a table in a bowl. Just because the table keeps the ball from falling to the ground and you have to knock over the bowl or table does not mean that the process is not exergonic. – Zhe Dec 2 '20 at 21:01
• @orthocresol The «snap» indeed is to break a physical wall in the inner of the tube of a glow stick to allow chemicals to mix which triggers the chemoluminescence. Demo of a monocolored strick, but there are polychromes around, too. Used by hikers, too. – Buttonwood Dec 2 '20 at 21:11
• Could it be you mean endergonic, not endogenic? (merriam-webster.com/dictionary/endogenic) – Buck Thorn Dec 3 '20 at 8:08

$$\mbox{state A «being in the restaurant»} \ce{->} \mbox{state B «back in the valley» } + \mbox{energy}$$