0
$\begingroup$

A textbook I'm reading called "Ansel's Pharmaceutical Calculations, 13th edition" defines the milliequivalent (meq) thus (p. 187):

This unit of measure is related to the total number of ionic charges in solution, and it takes note of the valence of the ions. In other words, it is a unit of measurement of the amount of chemical activity of an electrolyte.

It then goes on to demonstrate how can one convert the amount of electrolyte by mass to the amount in meqs and vice versa, and it gives the following example (pasting as a picture to keep all the original formatting): Exercise example from the book

Now see the note below the exercise, highlighted in yellow. The text does not explain any further, and I'm a bit confused.

If the amount in milliequivalent represents the number of ionic charges in solution or "chemical activity", why do we need to use the atomic weight of the hydrated ionic compound? Do the water molecules contribute anything to the chemical activity of the solution? If one meq means essentially one charge, the amount of meqs obtained when using a molecular weight that includes the hydration molecules is not representative of the amount of ions in the solution (as given by molar amounts).

So what is the reason for including the weight of water molecules in the calculations?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ If you can, try to avoid using the obsolete unit called "equivalent". it was banned in the middle of the 20th century, because it often produces inconsistencies when handling redox reactions. The notion of equivalent weight works all right for acid-base reactions, but it fails with redox chemistry. As an example, 1 mole KMnO4 is always 158.03 g. But 1 equivalent is 158.03/5 g in acidic solution or 158.03/4 g in neutral solution. So the risk of confusion is great. So try to use moles instead of equivalent ! This risk of confusion will not appear with moles. $\endgroup$ – Maurice Nov 22 '20 at 11:12
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. Many medical references still provide electrolyte dosages in meq and therefore doctors prescribe electrolytes in meq dosages, so I have to use it too... $\endgroup$ – Don_S Nov 22 '20 at 11:41
0
$\begingroup$

When you want to obtain a solution of $\ce{CaCl2}$ in water, you can do it by dissolving anhydrous compound $\ce{CaCl2}$, or the hydrated compound $\ce{CaCl2·2H2O}$. It does not matter which one to choose, provided you add enough water to compensate the difference and obtain at the end the wanted total volume. If you want to obtain $1$ mL of a final solution that has to be $4$ meQ/ml, you must dissolve $4$ mEq of $\ce{CaCl2}$ or $4$ mEq of $\ce{CaCl2·2H2O}$ in $1$ mL . It does not matter which one you use. The only requirement is that the number of Equivalent has to be $4$ mEq. But the Equivalent weight $\ce{CaCl2}$ is $111/2 = 55.5 $ g, and the equivalent weight of $\ce{CaCl2·6H2O}$ is $73.5$ g

To get the final solution with $\ce{CaCl2}$ you must choose to dissolve $4$ mEq $\ce{CaCl2}$, which weighs $\ce{(4·55.5}$ mg) = $222$ mg $\ce{CaCl2}$.

To get the same final solution with $\ce{CaCl2·6H2O}$ you must choose to dissolve $4$ mEq $\ce{CaCl2·6H2O}$, which weighs $\ce{(4·73.5}$ mg) = $294$ mg $\ce{CaCl2}$,

Do you understand ?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I understand this. What I don't understand is why do we need to take the water molecules into account when we are interested in meq of the electrolyte itself (e.g., when we want to give magnesium sulfate to someone with hypomagnesemia). $\endgroup$ – Don_S Nov 27 '20 at 21:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.