0
$\begingroup$

I'm writing an organic chemistry lab report on distillation and I thought I understood this, but the more I look at my lab textbook, I realize I don't. My textbook 1 explains that the temperature of a mixture will rise continuously while it boils and distills if it is composed of two components with similar boiling points, but take on a sigmoidal shape when they are

When a liquid mixture is distilled, often the temperature does not remain constant but increases throughout the distillation. The reason for this is that the composition of the vapor that is distilling varies continuously during the distillation (see Figure 14.3B).

p. 722

I don't understand this sentence: "The reason for this is that the composition of the vapor that is distilling varies continuously during the distillation." I understand why it is true, but not why it is an explanation for the shape of these graphs. Let's say I'm distilling volatile component B from non-volatile component A. If the boiling point of the mixture is the point at which the vapor pressure of the mixture equals the atmospheric pressure, what does the composition of the vapor have to do with anything? The relevant pressure is the atmospheric pressure, right? I would think that as component B is boiled off, the vapor pressure of the mixture would decrease, because the mixture has less B, by Raoult's law, Ptotal = PA + PB = PA°NA + PB°NB, and as its vapor pressure goes down, its boiling point goes up. I don't see why this isn't happening continuously.

Is the relevant pressure not the atmospheric pressure, but some additional pressure exerted by the vapor in the flask? (It's been a long time since I took general chemistry.)

  1. Pavia, D. L., Lampman, G. M., Kriz, G. S., & Engell, R. G. (2011). A small-scale approach to: Organic laboratory techniques. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Because being Pa and Pb very different you have an abrupt change when Na tends to zero. Mathematically that is continuous of course. $\endgroup$ – Alchimista Sep 21 at 10:31
  • $\begingroup$ In a mixture of little chloroform with much methanol (the second the component of higher boiling point), the boiling temperature actually may decrease till you reach the azeotropic point (e.g., en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azeotrope), despite the composition of your liquid is more and more rich in methanol. Similarity of boiling points of the two components isn't the cause for this slope here actually contradicting the claims illustrated by the illustration in the centre. Plot c) equally depends on the rate of distillation vs. the volume still to distill in the lower round bottom flask. $\endgroup$ – Buttonwood Sep 21 at 17:19
  • $\begingroup$ (Continuation) And if you perform a distillation of two liquids with well separated boiling points, especially with a column, you may glad to observe a drop of the head temperature (at the top of the column) prior to the arrival of the next fraction. $\endgroup$ – Buttonwood Sep 21 at 17:21
-1
$\begingroup$

You must understand... in an experiment, the sigmoidal shape will never have infinite slope... This would be a discontinuity... the sigmoidal shape (rightmost) and the "curve" (middle image) are essentially representing identical phenomena... there is a transition from one pure component to another. The only difference is how abrupt the change is... and this is determined by the endpoints/boiling points for each component. The more abrupt the change from one to another pure component, the steeper the slope of the change. I hope this helps. I can speak to this further, if necessary.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think the down vote is a bit unfair. This basically echoes my comment. It should not have mentioned very actual experiments as for the comment by Buttonwood, for instance. And simply a very long condenser can make the plot discontinuous without physical meaning. We shall stay realistic. The plots are about the physics not about the apparatus. $\endgroup$ – Alchimista Sep 22 at 10:51
  • $\begingroup$ I noticed the book is about experimental techniques :) $\endgroup$ – Alchimista Sep 22 at 12:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.