The dissociation of $\ce{HCl}$ in water is written as:
$$\ce{HCl (aq) -> H+ (aq) + Cl- (aq)} \tag{1}$$
Sometimes we also include $\ce{H2O}$ as a reactant to stress the fact that the protons are not isolated in water.
$$\ce{HCl (aq) + H2O (l)-> H3O+ (aq) + Cl- (aq)} \tag{2}$$
The last equation is quite useful to establish what is the conjugate acid and what is the conjugate base in Brønsted-Lowry's theory, as far as I understand.
Let's do the same thing for a strong base, say $\ce{NaOH}$. We write the dissociation in water:
$$\ce{NaOH (aq) -> Na+ (aq) + OH- (aq)} \tag{3}$$
What if I wanted to write equation $(3)$ in a form analogous to equation $(2)$? I tried including water as a reactant in the same way but then it yields a chemical equation where $\ce{H2O}$ is on both sides, so we can elide it.
In Brønsted-Lowry theory we generally write $\ce{H2O}$ in the dissociation for acids and for some basis, say $\ce{NH3}$. Why don't we do it for Arrhenius bases like $\ce{NaOH}$ or other hydroxides?