3
$\begingroup$

I have already attempted to interpret some of the peaks. Please tell me if they are correct/incorrect and anything that I have missed.

Unknown #49

Unknown #50

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ i think you have made those interpretations very cautiously and will full effort because the trend followed by them is clearly visible . i mean as the position increases the intensity decreases i.e. they are inversely proportional to each other i cant detect any wrong or miscalleneous point in your graph $\endgroup$ – agha rehan abbas Jun 28 '14 at 10:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In your first spectrum, I would be skeptical about the alkynic $\ce{#C-H}$ bond you've identified at approx. $3400\mathrm{cm^{-1}}$, as there is no corresponding alkynic $\ce{C#C}$ signal (typically roughly in the $2100-2300\mathrm{cm^{-1}}$ region). $\endgroup$ – Greg E. Jul 28 '14 at 18:38
2
$\begingroup$

In your first spectrum, the band at 3517 $\mathrm{cm^{-1}}$ indeed fits best to the $\ce{N-H}$ stretch of a primary amine (source). However, I would not assign the shoulder of this band to a $\ce{#C-H}$ stretch. Such a band would be sharper and perhaps more intense, and as Greg E. already pointed out in his comment to your question, there is also no corresponding $\ce{C#C}$ stretch band present (reference). The absence of bands in the range between 2500-2000 $\mathrm{cm^{-1}}$ allows you to rule out some other functional groups with double or triple bonds, like nitriles, thiocyanates, isocyanates, carbodiimides or azides. The band at 1715 $\mathrm{cm^{-1}}$ is a typical $\ce{C=O}$ stretch, and while it could be a ketone, the presence of the broad band at 2932 $\mathrm{cm^{-1}}$ (which could actually be a double band) makes it likely to be an aldehyde, since the double band can then be assigned to the $\ce{=C-H}$ stretch of the CHO group (it could also include other $\ce{C-H}$ stretches due to its width).

Your second spectrum appears a bit more complex. The broad, intense band at 3298 $\mathrm{cm^{-1}}$ in combination with the band at approximately 1680 $\mathrm{cm^{-1}}$ could be assigned to an amide, but I would expect a stronger carbonyl band in this case. Nevertheless, the intensity and width of the 3298 $\mathrm{cm^{-1}}$ band suggest the presence of a functional group capable of H-bonding. The bands between 2900-2800 $\mathrm{cm^{-1}}$ could be assigned to alkyl $\ce{C-H}$ stretches (source). For the compound to be aromatic, there should be aromatic $\ce{C-H}$ stretch bands present, slightly above 3000 $\mathrm{cm^{-1}}$ (source).

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

My interpretation of the first spectrum:

  • I would say that the 3517 band belongs to OH group. This is a typical shape OH group. Amines look more like two bands with a shoulder. However secondary amine is also a possibility. Other bands of OH should be the broad band between 1400 and 1300 from which the sharp bands arise. Than probably 1166, which seems to be tertiary OH group.
  • ≡C−H stretch is not right. Is is an overtone of the 1715 vibration.
  • The four bands around 2932 are CH3 and CH2 stretches.
  • 1461 is an antisymetric deformation of CH3, 1411 is scisorring of CH2 and 1359 is an umbrella of CH3.
  • The rest is a fingerprint region. I assume this is an aliphatic ester molecule.

The second spectrum I am not sure, however:

  • An aromatic vibrations are unlikely, there should be vibrations just over 3000, which are missing and the 2000 region also looks different.
  • There are aliphatic vibration just like in the first spectrum.
  • 3298 is not typical for amine. However I cannot rule it out. It might be an OH-group as well.
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.