-1
$\begingroup$

Is a molecule more stable with less bonding electrons or more anti-bonding electrons? This question arose when I was asked the stability comparison between $\ce{N2^+}$ and $\ce{N2^-}$.

$\endgroup$
0
1
$\begingroup$

Both (N2)+ and (N2)- have same bond order of 2.5 but (N2)+ would be more stable as it has lesser number of electrons leading to lower inter-electronic repulsions.It can also be said that (N2)- has more antibonding electrons leading to a lower stability than (N2)+

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Elaborating a bit- intro texts often show bonding and anti bonding orbitals equidistant from the starting atomic orbitals, but when you do the math, bonding orbitals are stabilized by a smaller amount than antibonding orbitals are destabilized $\endgroup$ – Andrew Aug 14 '20 at 0:42
  • $\begingroup$ @Andrew, Is that really true? I don't know much about this topic but I always thought that energy is partitioned equally such that the potential lost by BMO is same as that gained by ABMO. $\endgroup$ – B.Anshuman Aug 18 '20 at 6:44
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. The equal separation is a very useful approximation, but not quite quantititatively correct. The extra destabilization of the antibonding orbitals is why, for example, He2 is not as stable as He. $\endgroup$ – Andrew Aug 18 '20 at 11:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.