2
$\begingroup$

According to Chemistry Libretexts, the Gibbs free energy change of a cell reaction is related to the cell voltage as

$$ \Delta G = -nFE,$$

where $n$ is the number of moles of electrons passed and $F$ is the charge on a mole of electrons.

But $E$ decreases in value through the course of the cell reaction, so shouldn't $$\Delta G = -\int_{q_\mathrm{i}}^{q_\mathrm{f}} E\,\mathrm dq,$$

where $q_\mathrm{f} - q_\mathrm{i} = nF?$

$\endgroup$
1
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ It's strange to see a question like that from Michael Faraday. $\endgroup$ – andselisk Jul 17 '20 at 10:34
3
$\begingroup$

According to Nernst's equation,

$$E = E^o - \frac{RT}{nF}\ln Q$$

As you can see, $E$ is independent of $q$, therefore your proposed integral becomes,

$$\Delta G = - \int_{q_i}^{q_f}{E\cdot dq} = -E\int_{q_i}^{q_f}{dq} = -E\Delta q = -nFE$$


Alternatively, you can prove the the relation between Gibbs energy and cell potential as,

  • Multiply Nernst's equation by $nF$, we get,

$$nFE = nFE^o - RT\ln Q$$

  • Swapping the sides, we get,

$$-nFE = -nFE^o + RT\ln Q$$

  • As we know,

$$\Delta G = \Delta G^o + RT\ln Q$$

$$\Rightarrow \Delta G = -nFE$$

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ so you are saying that the concentration "Q" is completely unrelated to the charge? $\endgroup$ – Buraian Jul 17 '20 at 16:43
  • $\begingroup$ But 'q' is the amount of charged passed from the cathode to the anode of the electrolytic cell. And for charge to pass, a species must be reduced at the cathode and a species must be oxidized at the anode. The concentration of the species in the chemical equation changes, and hence Q is related with 'q'.. And if Q is related with q, then E is also related with q (from Nernst equation).. Correct me if I'm wrong.. $\endgroup$ – Michael Faraday Jul 17 '20 at 16:52
  • $\begingroup$ Any chemical reaction follows some "nth order kinetics", so the conc comes out to be a function of time, therefore Q should also be a function of time. Now, the integral is with respect to charge passed, hence E comes out. $\endgroup$ – Rahul Verma Jul 17 '20 at 17:25
  • $\begingroup$ @Rahul Verma if Q is a function of time, then by nernst equation, E is a function of time. Since it requires finite time to pass charge, E would vary as the charge is being passed. So E cannot be taken out of the integral since it's not constant. $\endgroup$ – Michael Faraday Jul 17 '20 at 18:35
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelFaraday: as you know, ∆G is a state fn, so I think the integral isn't required. It is because ∆H, ∆S and T are state / point fn $\endgroup$ – Rahul Verma Jul 18 '20 at 6:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.