I was solving a question where I had to determine a way to convert benzene into n-propyl benzene.

I figured out a way by first performing Friedel-Craft acylation with propanoyl chloride and then performing Clemmensen reduction to form the desired compound.

On checking the solution, there were 2 alternative ways portrayed:

One was the same method I had used.

The other involved reaction of benzene with n-chloropropane in the presence of $\ce{FeBr3}$.

However wouldn't there be carbocationic rearrangements taking place that convert the carbocation to isopropyl carbocation?

Please tell me what prevents the rearrangements from happening in the second case.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ IMO carbocationic rearrangements will occur and cumene will be the major product in the second reaction scheme. $\endgroup$ Jun 15, 2020 at 15:23
  • $\begingroup$ Yes that's what I think. But are you sure that this specific case will also result in the same thing? Because I believe that the alternative solution was presented because of some special property here $\endgroup$ Jun 15, 2020 at 15:40
  • $\begingroup$ chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/83518/… $\endgroup$
    – Mithoron
    Jun 15, 2020 at 23:27

2 Answers 2


Initially one would assume that cumene (isopropyl benzene) would be the major product. However, kinetic control does have a say in this reaction, according to Gilman and Means.1

At - 2°, n-propyl bromide with benzene and aluminum chloride gave n-propylbenzene, identified as its sulfonamide. Genvresse (6) obtained both n-propylbenzene and isopropylbenzene by conducting the reaction at reflux temperature. Konowalow (7) found that below $0^\circ$, n-propyl chloride gave n-propylbenzene, while from $0^\circ$ to reflux temperature it gave mixtures of n-propylbenzene and isopropylbenzene. More recently it has been shown that at $-6^\circ$, 60% of the monopropylbenzene was n-propylbenzene, and 40% was isopropylbenzene. At $35^\circ$, this ratio was reversed.

a low temperature would facilitate the production of larger amounts of n-propylbenzene due to kinetic control. However, this is still not a very efficient method of preparing n-propylbenzene, and acylation followed by Clemmensen/Wolff-Kishner reduction would be more suitable here.


  1. Gilman, Henry, R. N. Meals, “Rearrangements in the Friedel-Crafts Alkylation of Benzene” Journal of Organic Chemistry 1943, 08(2), 126–146. doi:10.1021/jo01190a003.

Aniruddha Deb gave an excellent answer to your question. Yet, there is another important point of differences on two Friedel-Craft processes: Alkylation vs acylation. I admit that rearrangement is the major drawback on alkylation process (using alkyl halides with a catalyst). However, another fact is you cannot stop the reaction after monoalkylation. The reaction would proceed to give di- and trialkylated products if steric effect did not stop giving more substitution. The reason for this is because alkylation activates the benzene nucleus to electrophilic substitution. For example, monoalkyl benzene is more active than benzene.

In contrary to direct alkylation, the alkylation by the acylation first followed by reduction method gives you much cleaner product. The reason for this is monoacylation deactivate the ring (recall o,p-directive and m-directive groups). As a result the reaction stop after monoacylation. You got only one product.

Finally, the difference between two reduction conditions: 1) Clemmensen Reduction: This is done in acidic conditions, hence should avoid if your compound contains acid-sensitive groups. 2) Wolff-Kishner Reduction: This is done in basic conditions, hence should avoid if your compound contains base-sensitive groups.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.