Often the Born-Lande equation is quoted (alongwith the calculation of the Madelung constant and Born exponent) with reference to rock-salt structure. But what if we take some other crystal, like rutile $\textrm{TiO}_2$. The Coulomb interaction energy for a reference $\text{Ti(IV)}$ ion is now: $$ U_{E} = \frac {e^2}{4π\epsilon_0} \sum_{\text{all surrounding ions}} \left( \frac {16}{r_{\text{Ti}^{4+}}} - \frac {8}{r_{\text{O}^{2-}}} \right) $$ I'm unable to figure out how does one get the Born-Lande equation using this expression for the electrostatic energy, that for the Pauli repulsion remaining as it is (that is, $U_P = \sum A/r_k^n$). If it were a rock-salt structure, we would say, lattice energy is, $$ U_{\text{lattice}} = \sum_{\text{entire lattice}} \left( U_E + U_P \right) $$ And after a little mathematical manipulation we would get, $$ U_{\text{lattice}} = -\frac{N_A Mz^2e^2}{4πR_0\epsilon_0} \left(1 - \frac1n\right) $$ However this doesn't seem proper for the case of rutile (and other cases too, like perovskite). Any suggestions are welcome.



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.