During my PhD, about fifty years ago, I had reason to use 4-t-butyl aci-nitro cyclohexane and found it to be remarkably stable. Usually aci- nitro compounds revert to nitro compounds very quickly unless they are stabilised by conjugation. There is no conjugation in this compound and the t-butyl group only serves to keep the cyclohexane ring in the chair configuration. There is no excessive steric hindrance in the chair configuration. So what's going on? My guess is that the conversion of the aci-nitro form to the thermodynamically more stable nitro form happens by the transfer of the OH proton to the carbon via the carbanion and that carbanion can be in the boat or the chair configuration. However, only in the boat configuration does the molecular orbital come near enough to the OH proton for the transfer to occur. Is this on the right track? I am not very familiar with molecular orbital theory (it had hardly started 50 years ago) so I would appreciate some input that I might be able to understand.

  • $\begingroup$ Good question. I have no idea why it's stable except for equotorial t-Bu group help the planer aci-nitro to exist (nitro group has to be either axial or equotorial). By the way, I tracked your work on phoyochemistry on the compound (doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(01)82227-9), I think! :-) $\endgroup$ – Mathew Mahindaratne Apr 3 at 15:40
  • $\begingroup$ Yep, that's me. Thanks for your interest. I didn't think anybody would be interested in such obscure work. $\endgroup$ – Geoffrey Smith Apr 4 at 0:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.