The lattice energy is not directly measurable, and it is difficult to calculate. In a paper about estimating lattice energies, the estimation for $\ce{Na2CO3}$ is 30% off from the reference value (which is from CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics). I mention sodium carbonate because ammonium carbonate is not one of their examples. The introduction explains why it is not possible to directly measure the lattice energy:
Lattice potential energy (UPOT) is a dominant term in the thermodynamic analysis of the existence and stability of ionic solids. Direct experimental determination is generally not possible since, in practice, the crystalline solid dissociates into atoms and not into gaseous ions, as is required in the lattice energy evaluation. Therefore, its indirect experimental determination, computation, or estimation is of considerable interest in modern materials science; indeed, whenever the energetics of condensed-state materials are studied, the chemical processes under consideration may be rationalized if the appropriate lattice energy steps can be incorporated into the thermochemical cycle.
They go one to discuss how you can obtain the lattice energy from experimental or theoretical data:
A variety of estimation methods for lattice energies is vavailable. These include the Born-Haber-Fajans thermochemical cycle (which requires ancillary thermodynamic data) and modern computational methods (which generally require knowledge of the lattice constants and the coordinates of the ions as well as needing an established force field). The computational methods range from direct energy calculational procedures through to programs that produce lattice energies in the course of their modeling of the solid. Quantum mechanical procedures are also available, but are highly computationally expensive and are generally applied only to the simpler systems.
Then they talk about cheaper methods that are less accurate. The paper is about a new quick estimation methods.
By contrast, a few exceedingly rapid estimation methods based on ionic radii or volume per formula unit (“molecular”volume) have been developed. Originally only applicable to the simpler binary ionic solids (such as MX (with a 1:1 charge ratio)), the volume-based approach has recently been extended by us to include MX2(2:1) and M2X (1:2)) salts.
So check the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics.