1
$\begingroup$

A question came up in class from one of my chemistry students. He asked what the largest, non-crystal, non carbon-based, molecule is. We ruled out complex proteins, DNA, and other polymers, as well as crystalline structures and metals from the list. I didn't have an answer for him, so I looked it up but could not find a definite answer. I found two threads on Reddit, listed below. Polyoxometalates come up, but without any specifics. I know "largest" can be subjective, so please specify if the molecule is "largest" because of its physical size or because of its mass.

https://www.reddit.com/r/chemistry/comments/2phl4s/whats_the_largest_inorganic_molecule_you_know/

https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/i6v07/what_is_the_biggest_noncrystalline_inorganic/

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I noticed someone down-voted my question. Can someone tell me why? $\endgroup$ – James Mar 5 '20 at 17:17
  • $\begingroup$ You didn't exclude amorphous substances... Another thing is what you call a polymer? Polyoxometalates already have quite repetitive structure. If you link together some big fullerenes, at which point it would become "a polymer"? $\endgroup$ – Mithoron Mar 29 '20 at 0:24
4
$\begingroup$

I agree with the redditors that the answer is likely a polyoxometalate.

$\ce{Na48[H_xMo368O1032(H2O)240(SO4)48] · \text{ca.}~1000 H2O}$ aka $\ce{\{Mo368\}}$ (core: $M \approx\pu{60.7 kDa},$ dimensions $\approx \pu{2.5 nm} × \pu{4.0 nm})$ is the primary candidate [1]:

enter image description here

Figure 2. Structure of 1a in crystals of 1 in polyhedral (a) and ball and stick (b) representation perpendicular to the $C_4$ axis and along the $C_4$ axis ((c) and (d); building units $\ce{\{Mo1\}}$ yellow, $\ce{\{Mo2\}}$ red, $\ce{\{Mo(Mo5)\}}$ blue with blue-turquoise pentagonal bipyramids; $\ce{O}$ atoms small red spheres, $\ce{S}$ atoms gray spheres). Note that one capping part is turned against the other by $360/16^\circ.$ The different building blocks and the arrays of different local symmetry are assigned.

A recent review of mass-spectrometry studies of large polyoxometalates is also available [2].

References

  1. Müller, A.; Beckmann, E.; Bögge, H.; Schmidtmann, M.; Dress, A. Inorganic Chemistry Goes Protein Size: A $\ce{Mo368}$ Nano-Hedgehog Initiating Nanochemistry by Symmetry Breaking. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2002, 41 (7), 1162–1167. DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020402)41:7<1162::AID-ANIE1162>3.0.CO;2-8.
  2. Surman, A. J.; Robbins, P. J.; Ujma, J.; Zheng, Q.; Barran, Perdita. E.; Cronin, L. Sizing and Discovery of Nanosized Polyoxometalate Clusters by Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (11), 3824–3830. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b00070.
$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Are these things really molecules? $\endgroup$ – Alchimista Mar 6 '20 at 8:20
  • $\begingroup$ @Alchimista. Yes, they are. I'm not sure about this one, but majority of polyoxometalates is also stable in appropriate solution, and some even in gas phase. $\endgroup$ – andselisk Mar 6 '20 at 10:30
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't the prefix "poly" a give away vs the question? $\endgroup$ – Beerhunter May 23 '20 at 13:37
  • $\begingroup$ @Beerhunter "Poly-" in polyoxometalates (POMs) usually refers to the presence of more than three metal centers linked via oxo-bridges. Under given conditions, one usually doesn't get all sorts of molecules/chains/blobs etc. of POMs, only one type of species. There is no molecular mass distribution to speak of, as one would, for example, in case of traditional organic polymers. $\endgroup$ – andselisk May 23 '20 at 15:21
  • $\begingroup$ @andselisk so the nomenclature states that if its three or more, tri, tetra etc aren't used and the reference is simply "poly"? $\endgroup$ – Beerhunter May 23 '20 at 18:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.