2
$\begingroup$

I was presented today with the following molecule:

2-(cyclopenta-2,4-dien-1-ylidene)-1-methylpyrrolidine

and asked the splitting pattern of $\ce{H_a}$ given that up to $\mathrm{^3J}$ and $\mathrm{^4J}$ coupling is allowed.

I thought that $\ce{H_a}$ couples to $\ce{H_b}$, $\ce{H_c}$ and $\ce{H_d}$ given that

  • there is a $\mathrm{^3J}$ coupling to $\ce{H_b}$ (Clockwise)
  • there is a $\mathrm{^4J}$ coupling to $\ce{H_c}$ (Clockwise)
  • there is a $\mathrm{^4J}$ coupling to $\ce{H_d}$ (Anticlockwise)

Hence the splitting would be ddd.

However, the answer is apparently dd for the splitting of the $\ce{H_a}$ signal.

My thought was that anticlockwise, the $\mathrm{^3J}$ coupling is not possible due to the absence of a π bond in that direction down to $\ce{H_d}$ hence the coupling through the π system would not be possible.

Am I correct or is there another reason for no $\mathrm{^3J}$ coupling to $\ce{H_d}$?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please note that using MathJax in the title creates issues; \ce{…} should only be used for chemical compounds and reactions. Also, I added the compound name as image metadata (it's better to fill in something meaningful in place of "Enter image description here"), and I suggest you do the same in your future post as it makes finding your post much easier. $\endgroup$
    – andselisk
    Dec 29, 2019 at 15:31
  • $\begingroup$ @andselisk why does it create issues in the title? is mathJax not compatible with other browsers or other mobile devices? $\endgroup$
    – vik1245
    Dec 29, 2019 at 15:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ See here and there. Besides, in this case there is literally no justification for typing π with MathJax as it can be easily inserted as a Unicode character. $\endgroup$
    – andselisk
    Dec 29, 2019 at 15:38

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.