4
$\begingroup$

Bromination of 4‐methylcyclohex‐1‐ene

My problem is with the methyl group. If it wasn't there, I had no problem. When the halonium bridge is made does the methyl group shift to give a more stable transition state or not?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I would believe that Br is attached mostly on the Carbon 4, and Br or OH on the Carbon 3. $\endgroup$ – Maurice Dec 27 '19 at 13:15
  • $\begingroup$ Why? I would expect a mixture close to 1:1 $\endgroup$ – Waylander Dec 27 '19 at 13:19
2
$\begingroup$

In order for a methyl shift to occur, there would need to be an empty orbital resulting from a carbocation intermediate for the methyl group to occupy.

Halohydrin mechanism for trans addition of Br and OH

Note that in the bromonium intermediate shown above, neither carbon in the three-membered ring has an entire empty orbital available. Hence methyl shift doesn't occur and the mechanism continues as expected, resulting in halohydrin formation.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That's not quite true; alkyl shifts can occur with simultaneous loss of a leaving group, cf. pinacol/semipinacol-type rearrangements. The C–LG σ* orbital would play the same role as the empty orbital which you are speaking of. $\endgroup$ – orthocresol Dec 27 '19 at 18:58
  • $\begingroup$ @orthocresol Purely out of curiosity, would a methyl-shifted product be more favorable than the above scheme? I’m not far enough in my organic chemistry curricula to know the correct answer. $\endgroup$ – elucidium Dec 27 '19 at 19:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The methyl would have to shift over two carbons. Or more precisely, you would need a hydride shift followed by a methyl shift. I find that rather unlikely, so I agree with Waylander (comment on another answer) that there is no selectivity in this reaction. $\endgroup$ – orthocresol Dec 27 '19 at 19:18
-2
$\begingroup$

methyl groups will not shift in a non-classical carbocation mechanism. This reaction will first have a $TS$ where the $\ce{Br2}$ molecule makes a 3 membered ring with the $\pi%$ bond and the water molecule will attach itself to $\ce{C3}$, as that is a more stable electron-deficient site due to the inductive effect of the methyl group.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your answer would be fine for cyclohexene but you omit regiochemistry. An inductive effect of methyl is not sufficient. A Reaxys search gave no hits but 7 for direct epoxidation with no sign of facial selectivity. See chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/86341/… for a guideline on how to think about such a problem. $\endgroup$ – user55119 Dec 27 '19 at 18:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.