# Do companies recover carbon dioxide and water from the purification step of cryogenic air separation, and how?

In the 3rd step of cryogenic air separation, filtered air is purified to remove water, $$\ce{CO2},$$ and hydrocarbons from the $$\ce{N2}$$-$$\ce{O2}$$-$$\ce{Ar}$$ stream. Im interested in knowing what happens with that $$\ce{CO2}$$ and water. Can both resources be recovered in a useful form? Can the $$\ce{CO2}$$ be purified? Are Praxair or others currently doing this?

Context: Im doing research on a theoretical industrial process which uses pure $$\ce{CO2},$$ water, and $$\ce{N2}.$$ I want to know if all these inputs can be obtained from a standard air separation facility (of course $$\ce{N2}$$ can). Im particularly interested in $$\ce{CO2}$$ recovery.

Please note I'm not interested in buying gases. I'm working on a publication about a theoretical system to produce protein from air and solar power. In your answer it would be helpful to provide links to papers or websites which give descriptions of the recovery process (energy costs etc).

• Please show that you have understood how much CO2 and oxygen and nitrogen there are in normal air, and how much C, N, O and H a simple protein contains.
– Karl
Oct 4, 2019 at 8:11
• You mean you are going to feed the CO2 into a greenhouse? Oct 4, 2019 at 9:05
• @Karl Your point is that the ratio of CO2 0.04% to N2 80% will be very low from air. True. Good aprox of cells is c4h7o2n. protein is about 16% N. The system also uses direct air capture (DAC) of CO2 to supplement missing C. However I want to recover CO2 from the N2 production if possible. Oct 4, 2019 at 10:07
• @BuckThorn No, it does not use plants. You can look at Solar Foods company to get an idea of a related technology. Oct 4, 2019 at 10:09
• @Karl, I never replied. Your comments were spot on. It was obv after, but glad you pointed it out! Mar 15, 2021 at 14:57

It is unlikely that this is an economically feasible $$\ce{CO2}$$ recovery method, which means commercial gas producers probably don't bother to isolate $$\ce{CO2}$$ this way (surely not water). The removal of $$\ce{CO2}$$ and water is performed with a pre-purification unit (PPU) that contains an adsorbing material such as alumina or molecular sieve. When the material nears saturation with impurities, the PPU needs to be taken off-line for regeneration. This is done by flowing warm $$\ce{N2}$$ over the adsorbent to heat it. It certainly seems possible to attempt capture of the $$\ce{CO2}$$ at this stage. Water is likely to be released from the adsorbent after the $$\ce{CO2}$$, allowing in principle a stream containing CO2 and N2 to be isolated. However isolation of $$\ce{CO2}$$ from this stream is expensive. As explained in a brochure from the CO2 Capture Project:
1. $$\ce{CO2}$$ can be separated from other gases by cooling and condensation. Cryogenic separation is widely used commercially for streams that already have high $$\ce{CO2}$$ concentrations (typically >90%) but it is not used for more dilute $$\ce{CO2}$$ streams.
2. A major disadvantage of cryogenic separation of $$\ce{CO2}$$ is the amount of energy required to provide the refrigeration necessary for the process, particularly for dilute gas streams. Another disadvantage is that some components, such as water, have to be removed before the gas stream is cooled, to avoid blockages.
3. Cryogenic separation has the advantage that it enables direct production of liquid $$\ce{CO2}$$, which is needed for certain transport options, such as transport by ship. Cryogenics would normally only be applied to high concentration, high pressure gases, such as in pre-combustion capture processes or oxygen fired combustion.