2
$\begingroup$

Hydrazine $\ce{N2H4}$ and dinitrogen tetroxide $\ce{N2O4}$ form a hypergolic fuel and oxidizer pair widely used in spacecraft including Akatsuki (あかつき, 暁, "Dawn") also known as the Venus Climate Orbiter (VCO) and Planet-C.

Wikipedia states:

Hydrazine can be monoprotonated to form various solid salts of the hydrazinium cation ($\ce{N2H5+}$) by treatment with mineral acids. A common salt is hydrazinium sulfate, $\ce{[N2H5]HSO4}$, also called hydrazine sulfate. Hydrazine sulfate was investigated as a treatment of cancer-induced cachexia, but proved ineffective.

Double protonation gives the hydrazinium dication ($\ce{H3NNH3^2+}$), of which various salts are known

A comment below the Space SE question How did salt prevent Akatsuki's insertion burn? says:

Every article I see seems to parrot the same thing. I'm guessing this is yet another translation issue (Japanese to English) and the deposits are a hydrazine reaction product... which you could call a "salt". It's an interesting failure case that I hadn't heard of, thanks for the question.

Question: Are there possible reaction products from hydrazine and dinitrogen tetroxide alone that could form an ionic assembly of cations and anions and considered a salt, or would this require some additional contaminant, perhaps water or some organic material to be involved?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How about with the reaction chamber and nozzle? Of what are they made? $\endgroup$ Sep 23, 2019 at 3:05
  • $\begingroup$ @DrMoishePippik I've annotated the image from this answer here: i.stack.imgur.com/wMImf.png I've mentioned "water, or some organic material contamination" in the question because these are common contaminations that can come from a wide variety of sources, and I think you are right that can include the reaction chamber and nozzle. Water could be (and probably is) a reaction product and could be plentiful, but my knowledge of chemistry is low and I don't know if that's enough to make something that might be considered a salt. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Sep 23, 2019 at 3:37
  • $\begingroup$ @DrMoishePippik The valve could potentially be pretty far away from them in terms of tubing, but I don't know much about rocket engines or what keeps the high pressure from the combustion chamber from pushing reaction products upstream in this case. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Sep 23, 2019 at 3:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ BTW, you might enjoy reading *Ignition! An Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants," by John D. Clark, library.sciencemadness.org/library/books/ignition.pdf $\endgroup$ Sep 23, 2019 at 3:45

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.