-3
$\begingroup$

What is the basis of comparison between two aromatic compounds having different ring structures Like in propyl and heptyl rings

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by Mithoron, Mathew Mahindaratne, Tyberius, user55119, Buck Thorn Aug 9 at 10:04

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ There is no point in comparing the stability of two entirely different things. $\endgroup$ – Ivan Neretin Aug 8 at 12:19
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean comparing how much "aromaticity" it has? The degree of aromaticity can be evaluated either through computations or hydrogenations; it represents how much more stable a compound is due to aromaticity (and thus how much more energy it takes to hydrogenate it compared to an "equivalent" non aromatic compound) $\endgroup$ – Raphaël Aug 8 at 12:34
  • $\begingroup$ To put Ivan's comment differently, how do you compare the stability of an electron and the stability of nothing? $\endgroup$ – Zhe Aug 8 at 13:29
0
$\begingroup$

You have to take ring strain into account. If you analyze the energy of an organic cycle as a function of the number of atoms in the ring, you find out that cyclohexane and cyclopentane rings are most stable, because the internal angles of an hexagon (120°) and a pentagon (108°) are closer to the angle in a tetrahedron (109°28').

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.