8
$\begingroup$

I'm reading an article about carbon sequestration, and I came across a strange phrase: "The flue gas is dilute in $\ce{CO2}$". I can't quite ascertain its meaning from the context. I think it means that the $\ce{CO2}$ is in low concentration in the flue gas, but I'm no chemistry expert.

Does this have a technical meaning in chemstry when a gas is dilute in another substance?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for including the article, my guess is that they are saying there is "not enough" $CO_2$ from what I can read, judging by the line following which reads "...resulting in... Low $CO_2$ partial pressure." The context is "barriers to implementation" which I assume... means not helping us scrub it. $\endgroup$ – Leonardo Sep 17 '12 at 3:40
  • $\begingroup$ @Leonardo: I added the link to the article. The phrase is included at the top of table 1, under "Barriers to implementation". $\endgroup$ – Paul Sep 17 '12 at 3:43
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Yes, kind of counter-intuitive that there is more $CO_2$ before combustion rather than after. Looking at the chart it seems to have all the answers but I have never looked into the process which is why I am only commenting. I think a good question would be about this process itself and why is there more carbon dioxide before combustion, and this is coal burning right? This is looking at the middle flow-chart for pre-combustion. $\endgroup$ – Leonardo Sep 17 '12 at 3:55
9
$\begingroup$

In this case, it's comparing post-air-combustion $\ce{CO2}$ capture with pre-combustion capture, and with post oxy-combustion capture.

In the two latter cases, the $\ce{CO2}$ stream is very highly concentrated. However, with air-combustion, the flue gases contain a lot of nitrogen and NOx; hence the $\ce{CO2}$ is diluted in the flue gas, compared to the other two methods, where it's concentrated.

And as to Leonardo's supplementary question in the comments, about why the pre-combustion stream has higher concentrations of $\ce{CO2}$ than the post-air combustion stream:

the comparison here isn't between two points in the same process. It's between analagous points in two completely different processes.

With post-combustion capture, the $\ce{CO2}$ is stripped out after the hydrocarbons (coal, gas, oil) have been burnt in air.

Whereas with pre-combustion capture, the hydrocarbon goes through a gasifier/shift process, resulting in a stream of $\ce{H2}$ mixed with $\ce{CO2}$. And at this point, the $\ce{CO2}$ is stripped out, and the $\ce{H2}$ is burnt.

And that's why the $\ce{CO2}$ concentration is higher in the pre-combustion capture process, than in the post air-combustion capture process.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.