If 1 mole of gaseous carbon atoms are converted into diamonds, calculate enthalpy change of process given that bond enthalpy of $\ce{C-C}$ bond is $\pu{400 kJ mol-1}.$

According to me, the answer should be that since C(diamond) has 4 bonds and C(gas) doesn't have any bonds, 4 bonds are being formed so enthalpy change should be

$$ΔH = 4\cdot (\pu{-400 kJ mol-1})$$

But in the correct solution it says each bond is counted twice, so answer will be

$$ΔH = \frac{4\cdot (\pu{-400 kJ mol-1})}{2}$$

I don't get why are we doing this. In other questions we don't consider the double counting of bonds. For example, another question I did had 1 mole phosphorus gas converting into $\ce{P4}$ molecule, and even though $\ce{P4}$ has 6 bonds, we did not consider what we did with diamond, so what is the reason for that?

  • $\begingroup$ Consider the simpler question: If 1 mole of hydrogen atoms (H) form dihydrogen (H-H), how many bonds are formed? Using your logic (each hydrogen makes one bond), there should be one mole bonds. But only 1/2 mole of dihydrogen was made. That would be 1 mole of single bonds in 1/2 mole of dihydrogen, not possible. $\endgroup$ – Karsten Theis Jul 22 '19 at 13:36

$\ce{P4}$ forms a molecular solid, whereas diamond is a covalent-network solid (see eg definitions here).

In a molecular solid, molecules containing a discrete number of covalently bonded atoms are arranged in a lattice stabilized by weak interactions such as van der Waals forces or hydrogen bonds between the molecules. In a covalent-network solid, the "molecules" are extended with no finite stoichiometry definining a molecular size.

When estimating the enthalpy change, you consider only covalent bonds, not weak intermolecular forces. Therefore, for $\ce{P4}$ you consider only the 6 P-P bonds, whereas in diamond you consider covalent bonds to nearest neighbours, and correct for the fact that when you rupture a bond to a neighbour, that neighbour also loses a bond, therefore the division by 2.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks ! , but if in future questions , I am unable to identify is the given substance if a covalent network solid or not , can we say that any molecule of the form Xy (like O2) where y is any number will not be a covalent-network solid ? $\endgroup$ – bscripts Jul 22 '19 at 14:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @bscripts If you can envision the molecule existing on its own in solution or in the gas phase, then it is likely to be a molecular solid. I can't think of exceptions of the bat, but there might be some, particularly if you change pressure or temperature to the right values. $\endgroup$ – Buck Thorn Jul 22 '19 at 16:37
  • $\begingroup$ I saw a question where nitrogen atoms where present on all the corners of a truncated octahedron and the energy required to break the octahedron was asked , and something similar was done to what was done with diamond above , would you call nitrogen a covalent network solid ? $\endgroup$ – bscripts Jul 22 '19 at 17:07
  • $\begingroup$ @bscripts Apparently there are exotic phases of nitrogen, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_nitrogen. I would not call solid phases of molecular nitrogen $\ce{N2}$ covalent network solids. $\endgroup$ – Buck Thorn Jul 22 '19 at 18:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.