I am forming N-hydroxysuccinimide ester: enter image description here

by DCC coupling with N-OH Succinimide and 2,2-Dimethoxy Acetic Acid. (Solvent: distilled THF). What I see on $\mathrm{^{1}H}$-NMR is 3 major singlets: $\delta \: \pu{4.840 ppm}$ (1H), $\delta \: \pu{3.432 ppm}$ (7.26H), $\delta \: \pu{2.731 ppm}$ (6.36H) + some impurities.

While the chemical shifts are well-aligned with theoretical predictions (in my opinion), integration ratios do not quite make sense. I wish I could purify it to have a clearer NMR spectrum and see whether I actually have the desired product, but I don't think my ester will stay stable in silica in column chromatography. Any suggestions? Would appreciate any thoughts& advice

  • $\begingroup$ Maybe take or get an NMR of the reagents and theoretical side products and see if there can be any overlap with the signals you see. I'm not sure I understand what your doubt is, though. NMR integration is not always very precise, especially for acidic protons. $\endgroup$ – user6376297 Jun 10 '19 at 15:17
  • $\begingroup$ What is your next reaction with this product? $\endgroup$ – Waylander Jun 10 '19 at 15:18
  • $\begingroup$ @user6376297 I have already taken the NMR of 2,2-Dimethoxy Acetic acid: $\delta \: \pu{4.867 ppm}$ (1H) and $\delta \: \pu{3.4615 ppm}$ (6.6H) (c.f. $\delta \: \pu{4.840 ppm}$ (1H) and $\delta \: \pu{3.432 ppm}$ (7.26H) in my product NMR) Not sure whether I can argue that peaks have 'shifted' in the product NMR $\endgroup$ – chemrese Jun 11 '19 at 3:37

If peaks for "some impurities" are appear around $\delta \: \pu{1.8 ppm}$, I assume you have residual THF in your crude product. The other multiplet of THF is probably burried under $\delta \: \pu{3.43 ppm}$ resonance. That would confirmed by your impurity integration, which should be equal to 1H unit equivalence. If I'm right, your 6.36H unit equivalence is actually overlap one of $\ce{CH3}$-resonance and one of $\ce{CH2}$-resonance.

On the other hand, the two resonances at $\delta \: \pu{3.43 ppm}$ and $\delta \: \pu{2.73 ppm}$ would very well be representing two $\ce{CH3}$-groups and (two $\ce{CH2}$-groups + part of THF impurity), respectively, as well.

|improve this answer|||||
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. but I have thoroughly vacuum dried my product and there is no peak at δ1.8 ppm. $\endgroup$ – chemrese Jun 11 '19 at 3:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.