0
$\begingroup$

There has to be a direct relation between metallic crystal structure formation and electrons in orbitals. For instance, we know that Fe2+ forms body centered cubic or bcc structure with the coordination number of 8, which means each Fe atom bonds with 8 others after getting rid of the two electrons in the 4S orbital.

The electron configuration of one Fe2+ would look as follows:

1s2 2s22p6 3s23p63d6

The problem is, that I do not see how Fe2+ would react with 8 others, based on the electron configuration and the octet rule, to form bcc structure.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ $\ce{Fe^2+}$ might form virtually any crystal structure depending on the anionic part. And no, there is no direct relationship between the electronic configuration of a single atom and the crystal structure it takes a part of (at least, I'm not aware of any). $\endgroup$ – andselisk May 6 at 10:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I second that. There is no relation. $\endgroup$ – Ivan Neretin May 6 at 11:08
  • $\begingroup$ @IvanNeretin maybe I should rephrase that. I mean the relation between the electronic configuration and coordination number, because there is a direct one. $\endgroup$ – vahidseo May 6 at 11:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is no matter and nothing to discuss. You can't look at the electronic structure and deduce crystal structure, period. Then again, you may find a good deal of papers on crystal structure prediction, but they deal with the subject at an entirely different complexity level. $\endgroup$ – Ivan Neretin May 6 at 12:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In solid state physics, generally one does not care a whole lot about the atomic electronic structure. $\endgroup$ – Jon Custer May 6 at 13:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.