2
$\begingroup$

In the following problem I am meant to deduce the molecules that are cis-trans isomers of each other. This question does not make much sense in my head because I thought that cis/trans isomerism was only applied to configurational isomers if there were only two types of groups bonded to the carbon atoms in the carbon-carbon double bond i.e. the reference plane. Such that, if there are more than two groups bonded to the carbons in the reference plane then E/Z isomerism should be used. However, then I thought that cis/trans isomerism is a subcategory of E/Z isomerism and therefore I tried to work out the solution using the E/Z method of finding configurational isomers by finding the relative priorities based on the atomic numbers for the atoms attached to the carbon atoms on each side. Using this method I discovered, that the solution could only be 'A. X and Z' since X seems to be an 'E' isomer since its high and low priority groups are across from eachother and Z seems to be a 'Z' isomer since its high and low priority groups are on the same side.

Am I on the right track?

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Am I on the right track?

Generally, yes. For this question, yes but you have over thought this question.

For starters, any answer with Y can be totally eliminated as Y is neither cis nor trans. Now you are down to answers 'A.' and 'D.'

Here you correctly determined the E and Z configurations of molecules with identical functional groups, but could have saved yourself some effort if you had recognized W and Z are identical molecules that are inversions/180° rotations of each other. Thus it can't be D. and the answer is in fact:

A.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.