1
$\begingroup$

Greetings dear chemists!

I got a nice exam problem on wich i am stuck for hours, well maybe the problem is with me. I know the problem can be solved. So here we go.

We got a weak monoprotic acid, we don't know its concentration, dissociation degree nor the dissociation constant. If we dilute it 3 times its volume, then the dissociated ions grow with an unknown constant, lets call it $y$. If we dilute the diluted solution again by 5 times its volume, then the dissociated ions grow 4 times. Whats the dissociation degree of the undiluted solution?

Yeah woah that looks tough. So lets give it my try.

Lets call the concentrations in order of dilution by $c_0, c_1, c_2$ and the dissociation degree by $\alpha_0,\alpha_1,\alpha_2$, and the dissociation constant of course $K_s$.

I managed to get three equations for this problem, but i feel i missed something or messed up my algebra someway i dont understand.

$$c_0=?,\alpha_0=?,K_s=?$$ $$\alpha_0=\frac{[A^-]}{c_0}$$ $$HA=H^++A^-$$ $$c_1=\frac{c_0}{3},\qquad c_2=\frac{c_1}{5} \to c_2=\frac{c_0}{15}$$ $$\alpha_1=y\alpha_0,\qquad \alpha_2=4\alpha_1 \to \alpha_2=4y\alpha_0$$ We call forth Ostwald; $$K_s=\frac{c_0\alpha_0^2}{1-\alpha_0}\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad (1)$$ $$K_s=\frac{c_1\alpha_1^2}{1-\alpha_1}=\frac{c_0y^2\alpha_0^2}{3(1-y\alpha_0)}\qquad \qquad(2)$$ $$K_s=\frac{c_2\alpha_2^2}{1-\alpha_2}=\frac{c_016y^2\alpha_0^2}{15(1-4y\alpha_0)}\qquad \qquad(3)$$ Equating the first and the second equation, i could get an expression for $y$. By setting $\beta=\frac{3}{1-\alpha_0}$ and ignoring the negative root $$y^2+y\beta\alpha_0-\beta=0$$ $$y=\frac{-\beta\alpha_0+\sqrt{\beta^2\alpha^2+4\beta}}{2}$$ My problem starts when i equate the second and the third equation; $$\frac{c_0y^2\alpha_0^2}{3(1-y\alpha_0)}=\frac{c_016y^2\alpha_0^2}{15(1-4y\alpha_0)}$$ $$5-20y\alpha_0=16-16y\alpha_0$$ $$11+4y\alpha_0=0$$ From wich i clearly see that im on the wrong track, since $\alpha_0$ and $y$ cant be negative, please help me on solving this nightmare. Maybe i missed something obvious, i dont really know that im on the right method to solve this either.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is the original problem in English? Can we get it exactly as stated? $\endgroup$ – MaxW Mar 28 at 17:39
  • $\begingroup$ No sorry its in hungarian, these kind of problems pop out from my professors head, i wrote it from my memory, we talked about it a lot after the exam so im pretty sure its correct. $\endgroup$ – Andrew Kovács Mar 28 at 17:41
  • $\begingroup$ If you do ask the prof, and he clarifies the problem, I'd sure like to know what he proposed as the answer. $\endgroup$ – MaxW Mar 29 at 17:33
1
$\begingroup$

You are on the right track according to the directions given to you ( = the problem statement), but the directions themselves are wrong.

Say you had an equilibrium with $\ce{{[H^+][A^-]\over[HA]}=K}$. You dilute it five-fold and tell your particles to wait a bit with dissociation until you are done with the math. That makes all concentrations 5 times smaller, and consequently, the LHS is now $1\over5$ of what it used to be. Now you tell them to increase their dissociation by a factor of 4. In doing so, each of $\ce{[H+]}$ and $\ce{[A-]}$ increases four-fold, thus growing the LHS to $16\over5$ of its initial value, or more than 3 times greater than $K$, and they do that at the expense of the remaining $\ce{[HA]}$, decreasing the denominator and increasing the LHS further yet. Just how is it going to be the same $\ce{K}$ again?

I suppose it is some subtlety of wording that we are misinterpreting here. It might have been lost in translation, but can't we at least make a reasonable guess? Could it be that the 4-fold increase is compared to the initial state, that is, to $\alpha_0$ and not to $\alpha_1$? No, that would not suffice. Still, there might be other possibilities...

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer and time reading my post, your reasoning seems correct, obviously i misunderstood something or it might be but its more likely not that the problem itself i was doing is wrong. Feel free to delete my post, but i think your thoughts are a nice example for learning so i'll leave it. $\endgroup$ – Andrew Kovács Mar 28 at 17:54
  • $\begingroup$ @IvanNeretin - The degree of dissociation is relative not absolute. So for the diluted acid a greater fraction ionizes, but the concentrations are all smaller. $\endgroup$ – MaxW Mar 28 at 17:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MaxW They are all smaller in my answer. [H+] and [A-] are 4/5 of what they were before the dilution, and [HA] is less than 1/5 of its former value. $\endgroup$ – Ivan Neretin Mar 28 at 19:00
1
$\begingroup$

$K_a = \dfrac{\ce{[H^+][A^-]}}{\ce{[HA]}}$

Let's assume a weak acid so that we'll assume a negligible fraction ionizes. So for all concentrations we get

$\ce{[H^+] = [A^-]} = \sqrt{(K_a)\ce{([HA])}}$

and the dissociation degree (fraction) is:

$\dfrac{\ce{[A^-]}}{\ce{[HA]}} = \sqrt{\dfrac{K_a}{\ce{[HA]}}}$

So if the concentration of HA is reduced by a factor of 5, then the dissociation degree should only be $\sqrt{5} \approx 2.24$ greater, not 4 times greater.

Now to get a greater degree of ionization we could have a very dilute solution of acid, and get into a situation where the autodissociation of water is important.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for all your efforts, nice answer though i have tried it too with this shortcut but didnt gave me results i wanted, I'll look into it tomorrow, i didnt want to bother my prof with my stupid questions since he is the dean, but it looks like i have no other choice. $\endgroup$ – Andrew Kovács Mar 28 at 20:40
  • $\begingroup$ @AndrewKovács - As I said, the only way that I can think of to have a five-fold dilution get a four fold increase in ionization is to have the ionization of water come into play. $\endgroup$ – MaxW Mar 28 at 20:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.