5
$\begingroup$

Which of the two structures is more stable?

c: (3‐methylcyclohex‐1‐en‐1‐yl)benzene; d: (5‐methylcyclohex‐1‐en‐1‐yl)benzene

As far as I know, alkenes with a greater number of hyperconjugating structures are more stable. Hyperconjugation has a greater stabilizing effect than inductive effect. So, (d) should be more stable as it has more α-hydrogens. But the answer given in the book is (c).

Is the answer wrong? Or am I missing something?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Only sterics may be important here. $\endgroup$ – Mithoron Mar 23 at 20:43
2
$\begingroup$

The explanation can[1] be given by analysing their respective resonance[2] structures which is as follows:

enter image description here (Credits: ChemWriter)


Now, inductive effects would work.

In case of first (c's resonance), positive charge would be stabilised by $\ce{+I}$ effect of methyl group; whereas in the second (d's resonance) one, $\ce{+I}$ effect would become dead upto the positive charge.

Hence, less stable would be (d).


Notes:

[1]: Firstly, I'm not sure if hyperconjugation will stabilize carbocation in resonance structures or not, because it will separate the charges even more. Secondly, in the given structures, it is very hard to differentiate the stability, as contribution of inductive and hyperconjugation are resulting in comparable stabilities. Hence, I tried it explaining by other canonical form.

[2]: resonance will happen due to conjugation of $\ce{\pi}$ bonds in both of the molecules

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.