1
$\begingroup$

Pentalene is one of the most famous antiaromatic molecules. But I obtained its energy of $\pi$ system as $8\alpha+10.46\beta$ by Hückel method (with a bit complicated but straightforward calculation). This value is lower than that of localized form $8(\alpha+\beta)$. So Hückel method looks to be not able to explain antiaromaticity. Are there any misunderstandings? It seems that many of antiaromatic molecules are predicted lower than their all-ethylene counterparts.

(I don't think radicality is a key for antiaromaticity, and I'd like to know a general, quantum mechanical explanation about antiaromatic molecules if it exists.)

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Aromatic or antiaromatic, it is still conjugated, so no wonder it is better off than the all-ethylene analog. The general explanation is precisely where you don't think it is. $\endgroup$ – Ivan Neretin Mar 21 at 15:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ With Huckel MOT, aromaticity / antiaromaticity should be determined with reference to a linear conjugated analogue, so e.g. cyclobutadiene is compared with butadiene, not two ethylenes. I am not sure how this carries over to pentalene. Arguably, Huckel's rules were designed for monocyclic systems, not polycyclic ones. $\endgroup$ – orthocresol Mar 21 at 15:40
  • $\begingroup$ I solved the secular equation of pentalene, whose matrix has two resonance integral in addition to that of cyclooctatetraene. The solutions have no degeneracy, so I think penetalene is not expected to be radical. $\endgroup$ – Sakai Mar 22 at 4:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.