0
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

even when there is a possibility of conjugation why aren't bond lengths equal?

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by Todd Minehardt, A.K., Jon Custer, Mithoron, aventurin Mar 19 at 16:49

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ Could you cite where you found that the bond lengths are not equal? $\endgroup$ – A.K. Mar 19 at 13:20
  • $\begingroup$ Heard of anti aromaticity it destabilizes a cyclic compound so to prevent it no conjugation $\endgroup$ – Aditya Garg Mar 19 at 13:20
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Your title does not match your question. All double bonds are equal all right. $\endgroup$ – Ivan Neretin Mar 19 at 14:09
  • $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate of Resonance structure of cyclobutadiene? $\endgroup$ – Mithoron Mar 19 at 16:47
4
$\begingroup$

Anti-aromatic compounds have no delocalization of electrons hence no resonance. To check aromatic character we use huckel's rule of (4n+2)π e- present in a conjugated closed loop. An anti aromatic compound would have only 4nπ electrons which is the case with above mentioned compound . Hence the bond lengths are different. enter image description hereenter image description here

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.