enter image description here

While comparing the stability, as the $\ce{CH3}$ group is electron donating, the first structure should be more stable due to this reason. But apparently the second one is more stable. Is there another phenomenon taking place here?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Isn't your conclusion contradictory? $\endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    Mar 4 '19 at 16:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I do not understand $\endgroup$
    – user638473
    Mar 4 '19 at 16:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As formulated one should expect 2 to be more stable. Point is eventually why is the ethyl fragment not stabilising more than a methyl, as usually found and as resumed here chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/47008/… $\endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    Mar 4 '19 at 16:15
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ This is getting absurd. I quite wonder how detached from reality these textbook exercises would get. For all practical purposes there no difference here. You can argue about "inductive effect" vs "hyperconjugation" however long you wish... $\endgroup$
    – Mithoron
    Mar 4 '19 at 17:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ On the same line of @Mithoron though the example might be of interest in a proper contest (e.g. computational approach) it seems to stretched simple rules to the limit. $\endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    Mar 5 '19 at 8:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.