I think there's a basic idea I'm missing about 3 Dimensional representation of molecules. I think it may be about converting to Fischer representation. Consider the following two products of bromination of an alkene, the first one being for cis-form and the 2nd one for trans-form.

3d representation

I know the question may sound stupid, but it's crucial to get the basics. Why is the product II) the meso form and the products I) are the optically active forms. By what I know, the solid wedge goes towards the observer, so in product II), shouldn't the Bromine substituent(or maybe the $CH_3$ substituent) and $H$ atom be on the 'same side', making it the one optically active?


You have drawn the compounds correctly, and yes

  • a solid wedge means the bond is coming out of the plane of the screen towards you
  • a dashed wedge means the bond is going behind the plane of the screen away from you
  • a solid line means the bond lies in the plane of the screen

Here is a Newman projection of your molecules, sometimes Newman projections can make it easier to "see" things.

enter image description here

Build a model (I did) or flip the drawings around, there is no way you can interconvert the isomers labeled "S,S' and "R,R"; they are chiral enantiomers. The meso compound and its mirror image are easily converted into one another (try rotating the molecule about a $\ce{C_2}$ axis that lies in the plane of the screen, 2) is perpendicular to the mirror plane [the dashed line in my drawing] and 3) bisects the $\ce{C_2-C_3}$ bond in the molecule); they are indeed representations of the same molecule.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The R,R and S,S stereo isomers have $C_2$ symmetry, with the axis lying as you described it for the meso compound. The meso isomer is either of $S_2=C_i$ symmetry (staggered) or $C_s$ symmetry (eclipsed) - it does not have a $C_2$ axis. $\endgroup$ – Martin - マーチン May 23 '14 at 3:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Martin I did not say that the meso isomer has a $\ce{C_2}$ axis. In fact I didn't mention the symmetry of the molecules at all. What I did say was that the two meso drawings could be converted one into the other by rotation about a specific axis external to the molecule (not a molecular symmetry element); and that the R,R and S,S stereoisomers cannot be converted one into the other by rotations or translations. $\endgroup$ – ron May 23 '14 at 13:11
  • $\begingroup$ That is of course absolutely true and that statement just slipped by me. I am sorry if I caused any confusion. $\endgroup$ – Martin - マーチン May 24 '14 at 16:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.