5
$\begingroup$

From here and here I found that the bond angle between the equatorial $\ce{F}$'s in $\ce{SF4}$ is less than that in $\ce{SOF4}$. I understand that is because of greater repulsion by lone pair than by double bond.

But the angle between the axial $\ce{F}$'s in $\ce{SF4}$ is more than that in $\ce{SOF4}$. I am not able to understand why is this so. Shouldn't the lone pair repel more than double bond here too?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'd say the effects are too subtle to be explained that easily. $\endgroup$ Feb 6, 2019 at 5:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You are trying to compare 2 different geometries: one with 4 vertices and the other with 5! Of course angles won't match $\endgroup$
    – SteffX
    Feb 6, 2019 at 14:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @SteffX Try counting again and don't forget about lone pair. $\endgroup$
    – andselisk
    Feb 6, 2019 at 15:05
  • $\begingroup$ I suspect that some subtle molecular orbital effects are going on here. Oxygen has two pairs of pi-symmetry electrons to donate and is tending to pull the fluorines towards a symmetric structure to optimize that interaction. $\endgroup$ Feb 6, 2019 at 15:25

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.