5
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

One singlet stems from the aldehyde H, and another from the Cp ring with 5 hydrogens attached.

However, the ring with the aldehyde group attached has hydrogens in two chemical environments which are just three bonds apart from each other. Why do they not couple? (400 MHz, CDCl3)

| improve this question | | | | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I'm thinking: A is the aldehyde H, D is the 5 H's on the Cp ring without the aldehyde, B the 2 H's closer to the aldehyde on the ring and C the remaining two, right? $\endgroup$ – user74080 Feb 1 '19 at 1:11
  • $\begingroup$ Related: 1H NMR of Acetylferrocene I generally agree with your assignments. As long writes in the linked question: due to magnetic inequivalence, this is an AA'XX' system where the spectrum will exhibit second order effects. Why this fine structure isn't manifested, though, I don't know. $\endgroup$ – orthocresol Feb 1 '19 at 1:19
  • $\begingroup$ Judging from your residual chloroform peak, your sample is highly concentrate. Also, for good mesure, it is at least $\pu{0.1 ppm}$ broad ($\pu{40 Hz}$ since you used $\pu{400 MHz}$ machine). That means your peaks looks broad singlets, instead of having splitted. $\endgroup$ – Mathew Mahindaratne Feb 1 '19 at 2:16
  • $\begingroup$ @MathewMahindaratne that explanation is very reasonable, but if you look at a c13 spectrum (eg Aldrich) you only see one peak for the substituted ring. What's that all about? $\endgroup$ – Buck Thorn Feb 1 '19 at 10:28
  • $\begingroup$ @Try Hard: I posted some date to answer your question a few days ago. I apologize for the delay. $\endgroup$ – Mathew Mahindaratne Feb 5 '19 at 2:54
1
$\begingroup$

I like to address some interesting NMR features of ferrocene derivatives. Try Hard's question about $\mathrm{^{13}C-NMR}$ of ferrocenecarboxaldehyde showing one signal for the substituted cyclopentyl ring prompt me to find some solid evidence. However, it seems like most of ferrocene derivatives give similar results regardless of how strong magnetic field you used. Therefore, Aldrich NMR spectra may not be the best spectra with high definition (e.g., they use $\lt \pu{300 MHz}$ machine for $\mathrm{^{1}H-NMR}$).

Following $\mathrm{^{13}C-NMR}$ values from very recent paper, which published NMR data of few ferrocene derivatives using a $\pu{400 MHz}$ (but $\pu{100 MHz}$ for $\mathrm{^{13}C}$) machine (Ref.1):

ferrocene

The values in left hand side is for $\mathrm{C_p}$ ring (substituted) while single value at the bottom is for all 5 $\ce{C}$s of unsubstituted $\mathrm{C_{p'}}$ ring. If you look closely, you'd see monosubstituted rings have so close values that they may overlap in spectra taken in low resolution machines.

Reference:

  1. N. D'Antona, R. Morrone, G. Gambera, S. Pedotti, “Enantiorecognition of planar “metallocenic” chirality by a nitrile hydratase/amidase bienzymatic system,” Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 4393-4399 (DOI: 10.1039/C6OB00689B).
| improve this answer | | | | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.