1
$\begingroup$

Well, I found that lead cation $\ce{Pb^2+}$ is present in both group 1 and group 2 of cation analysis. But why?

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by Jon Custer, aventurin, Mithoron, Tyberius, airhuff Jan 29 at 20:11

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

6
$\begingroup$

Simply because lead(II) fits both analytical groups:

One reason for putting lead in both groups is that the chloride is somewhat of a borderline case in terms of being insoluble enough to appear in Group I. Group II represents a more complicated analysis but is more sensitive for lead.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Lead (II) chloride has enough solubility so it could slip through the cracks in Group I. Group II where the sulfide is precipitated is more sensitive. $\endgroup$ – Oscar Lanzi Jan 29 at 15:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @OscarLanzi You are right, probably it would be worth adding that there are no sharp margins between these 6 groups and various sources add or remove cations from one group to another arbitrarily. $\endgroup$ – andselisk Jan 29 at 15:49

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.