I did a project on the Fenton reaction and rate of decomposition of $\ce{H2O2}$. I used colorimetry to measure the rate of decolourisation of methylene blue when I mixed $\pu{5e-6 mol}$ $\ce{FeCl3}$ and $\pu{0.2 mL}$ of different concentrations of $\ce{H2O2}$ (1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20%).

After processing the data, I found the following graph: rate vs concentration of H2O2

I was wondering why with higher concentrations of $\ce{H2O2}$ the rate decreases. I initially wanted to analyse this according to the Michaelis-Menten model (as $\ce{Fe^3+}$ ion can be regarded as a catalyst in this reaction). However, it seems my data goes in the opposite direction as the Michaelis-Menten plot. What surprised me most that it was decreasing.

I came up with a few hypotheses for this, and searched for papers, but I could not find any with results similar to mine. My main hypothesis was that because $\ce{Fe}$ ion and $\ce{H2O2}$ form $\ce{OH.}$ radicals and $\ce{OOH.}$ radicals (as reported here and here), and these radicals are what cause the decomposition of methylene blue, I thought that maybe if there was too high a concentration of $\ce{H2O2}$, there would be too many radicals, and this would in turn terminate the free radical reactions (when 2 free radicals meet). At lower concentrations, the radicals would continue propagating, hence decolourising methylene blue faster.

Moreover, I know that this is not a problem with the colorimeter, as I could see this decolourisation outside the colorimeter too. The following is a screenshot of a video I took; each reaction in the cuvette was started at the same time, and concentrations of $\ce{H2O2}$ used in order from left to right are 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20%.

colour of test tubes

I was wondering if anyone knew why this happened.

  • $\begingroup$ Do you have a negative control, i.e. no $\ce{H2O2}$ added? I don't quite understand the y-axis of your graph. Why isn't it change in MB concentration divided by time? $\endgroup$
    – Karsten
    Jan 23, 2019 at 2:46

1 Answer 1


In this paper, a similar reduction in rate is observed at concentrations of H2O2 above 0.03 M final H2O2 concentration (which is about 0.1 wt %). They attribute it to $\ce{HO.}$ reacting with H2O2 (to yield $\ce{HOO.}$) more quickly than it reacts with MB. The result is that $\ce{HOO.}$ is much more abundant than $\ce{HO.}$ and its lower reactivity means a slower rate of reaction with MB.

Based on their data, I would recommend repeating the experiment with much lower H2O2 concentrations.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.