When I initially learned about substitution reactions, there would be times where a poor leaving group had to be changed into a better one in order to proceed with a substitution reaction. For instance, changing a poor leaving group (-OH) to a better one, such as water: enter image description here

After the "good" leaving group is made, it is displaced via an SN2 reaction. The displacement of the water required a nucleophile. However, I recently came across this mechanism (dehydration): enter image description here

In this case, the water leaves by itself. My question is:

If I ever come across an instance where water (a good leaving group), must leave, how should I assess whether it can leave BY ITSELF or not?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Generally, you look at the cationic intermediate to see if it is stabilized or not. For example, creating a cation from the primary alcohol is too disfavored. Secondary cations on the other hand, are reasonably attainable though some forcing conditions may be required. $\endgroup$ – Zhe Nov 27 '18 at 14:22
  • $\begingroup$ That does make sense since a primary carbocation is far too unstable. So would it be alright to just displace water if it results in a secondary or tertiary carbocation? $\endgroup$ – James Bond Nov 27 '18 at 14:55
  • $\begingroup$ Sn1 reactions of secondary and tertiary alcohols are standard fare in a beginning organic chemistry course. $\endgroup$ – Zhe Nov 27 '18 at 18:44

In that kind of reactions, the full explanation would require advanced quantic calculation to determine the energy of all the present entities.

In chemistry, we usually prefer giving a half-quantitative explanation to explain the formation of the observed products.

In your example A —> B + C + D, A is a secondary alcohol and it CAN be transformed to a carbocation leading to B... but you can see it is far from perfect since B represents only 50% of the yield. The result would be much more clear-cut with a primary alcohol (unstable carbocation) or a tertiary one (very stable carbocation). I think you are expected to explain all that.

  • $\begingroup$ Dehydration represents 100% of the yield as shown in the figure. 3 possible isomers result from the secondary cation; this is not an indication of how stable or otherwise the secondary cation is. $\endgroup$ – Waylander Nov 27 '18 at 14:46
  • $\begingroup$ @Waylander Yes you are right. I think I was too focused on the questions I had at the time and I will probably change my answer $\endgroup$ – SteffX Nov 27 '18 at 14:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.