5
$\begingroup$

In deuterated benzene ($99\%$) the residual protio peak is a singlet at $\pu{7.16 ppm}$. This however doesn't make sense since the protons will be randomly distributed among various benzene molecules. Therefore there won't be a mixture of $99$ $\ce{C6D6}$ molecules and $1$ $\ce{C6H6}$ but $94$ $\ce{C6D6}$ and $6$ $\ce{C6D5H}$. Considering that deuterium has a spin of $1$ the residual solvent peak in D6-benzene should be a septet. Any thoughts?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

To a very good approximation, $J_\ce{HD}$ in a deuterated molecule is related to $J_\ce{HH}$ in the corresponding protonated molecule by the gyromagnetic ratios:

$$\frac{J_\ce{HD}}{J_\ce{HH}} = \frac{\gamma_\ce{D}}{\gamma_\ce{H}} = \frac{\pu{41.066 * 10^6 rad s-1 T-1}}{\pu{267.522 * 10^6 rad s-1 T-1}} = 0.15$$

In benzene where $^3J_\ce{HH} = \pu{7.6 Hz}$ and $^4J_\ce{HH} = \pu{1.4 Hz}$ (Reich NMR tables), we would thus have $^3J_\ce{HD} \approx \pu{1.2 Hz}$ and $^4J_\ce{HD} \approx \pu{0.2 Hz}$. The four-bond meta coupling would be all but invisible, and the three-bond ortho coupling if resolved would give rise to a $1:2:3:2:1$ quintet.

On a lower-field spectrometer this relatively small coupling is usually not properly resolved. A suitable window multiplication, though, will reveal all. I don't have a d6-benzene spectrum on hand, but I do have a $\pu{500 MHz}$ d8-toluene spectrum here. The two spectra on the left are the aromatic residual peaks, but at the bottom-left a Gaussian window function has been used to improve resolution (at the cost of signal:noise ratio). This allows us to resolve the three-bond ortho couplings of $\pu{1.1 Hz}$.

Residual solvent signals in d8-toluene

At the bottom-right is the signal corresponding to residual $\ce{C6D5CD2H}$. Since the two-bond H–D coupling has a larger magnitude ($^2J_\ce{HD} = \pu{2.2 Hz}$), it is much easier to resolve, and can be seen even with the normal exponential window function (which sacrifices resolution for signal:noise ratio improvement).

Similarly, in d6-DMSO (shown below at $\pu{500 MHz}$), the two-bond coupling is more easily resolved.

Residual solvent signal in d6-DMSO

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Really nice answer. +1 $\endgroup$ – long Dec 3 '18 at 21:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.