1
$\begingroup$

It is given voltaic cell $\ce{Cu}|\ce{CuSO4}(\pu{10^-3 M})||\ce{CH3COONa}(10^{-2})|\ce{Pt}(\ce{H2})(\pu{1 atm})$. Find the potential at $\pu{50^\circ C}$.
Given $K_\mathrm{a}$ for $H= 1.8 \times 10^{-3}$. $E_{\ce{Cu^2+/Cu}} = \pu{0.336 V}$

When voltaic cell starts working: $\ce{H2}$ becomes $\ce{2H+}$. In the other hand $\ce{CH3COO-}$ hydrolizes forming $\ce{CH3COOH}$ and $\ce{OH-}$. We know $K_\mathrm{a}$ and we can find $K_\mathrm{b}$. And from that we can find the concentration of $\ce{OH-}$ and after that using the formula $\mathrm{pH}=14-\mathrm{pOH}$ we can find the concentration of $\ce{H+}$.

Now how we can find the concentration of $\ce{Cu^2+}$ in order to replace it into Nernst equation? \begin{align} E &=E^\circ - \frac{RT}{nF} \cdot \ln\{\text{Qc}\} \text{, where}& \text{Qc} &= \frac{[\ce{H+}]}{[\ce{Cu^2+}]}. \end{align}

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

A correct standard notation for the galvanic cell would also include the physical state of each species involved. As such, the correct notation for the given cell is:

$$\ce{Cu(s)}~|~\ce{CuSO4(aq)}~(10^{-3}~\mathrm{M})~||~\ce{CH3COONa~(aq)}~(10^{-2}~\mathrm{M})~|~\ce{Pt(s)}~(\ce{H2(g)})~(1~ \mathrm{atm})$$

Recall that aqueous solutions of salts are generally accompanied by their molarity in solution. Also, metals are usually solid, while gaseous species are accompanied by a reference electrode (platinum in this case) and their pressure value.

In your case, notice that the ionic salt $\ce{CuSO4}$ is assumed to be a $100\%$ dissociated ionic salt, hence, its aqueous solution will produce $[\ce{Cu^{2+}}]=[\ce{SO4^{2-}}]=10^{-3}\mathrm{M}$. That should answer your final query.

Apart from that, your expression for $\mathrm{Q_c}$ is wrong. It should be $\displaystyle\mathrm{Q}=\frac{p_{\ce{H2}}}{[\ce{Cu^{+2}}]}$. Since $\ce{H2}$ is present in gaseous form, use its pressure value in the expression for $\mathrm{Q}$ (and not molarity which doesn't exist)

PS: The concentration ($\pu{10^−3M}$) that's given to you is the concentration of copper ions after equilibrium has been achieved for the interconversion of $\ce{Cu+2(aq)}$ and $\ce{Cu(s)}$.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.