2
$\begingroup$

So, my book says that transition elements have higher enthalpies of atomization than other elements (say s- or p- block) because of stronger metallic bonding, primarily due to large number of unpaired electrons in the d-orbitals.

Now, if that is the case, then the atomization energy for $\ce{Ni}$ should be less than for $\ce{Fe}$ and $\ce{Co}$, as $\ce{Ni}$ has only 2 unpaired electrons compared to $\ce{Fe}$ and $\ce{Co}$ (4 and 3 respectively).

Actually, it is just the opposite.

$$\begin{array}{cc} \text{Metal} & \Delta_\text{atom}H(\ce{M})\text{ / }\mathrm{kJ~mol^{-1}} \\ \hline \ce{Ni} & 430 \\ \ce{Co} & 425 \\ \ce{Fe} & 416 \end{array}$$

Why could this be?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

These sorts of generalities always sweep aside other considerations.

$\ce{^26Fe}$ has a ​body-centered cubic crystal structure.

$\ce{^27Co}$ has a ​hexagonal close-packed crystal structure.

$\ce{^28Ni}$ has a ​face-centered cubic crystal structure.

Here is a nice table showing the overall trends.

$\endgroup$
0
1
$\begingroup$

According to J.D.Lee's "Concise Inorganic Chemistry", the extra electrons in the metals of the 2nd half of the transition series, like Fe, Ni etc.. are excited to the p level .. and then the unpaired electrons in the d, s and p levels participate in metallic bonding .. so Ni has the max. unpaired electrons, followed by Co and then Fe ... and hence strength of metallic bonding follows same order

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.