In the Kröger-Vink notation the effective charge $c$ is marked as superscript while the site location $s$ is marked as subscript on the atom itself $\ce{A}$:
$$\ce{A^{c}_{s}}$$
As far as I have learned the effective charge is the charge difference from the perfect lattice situation. The Wikipedia definition agrees:
$c$ corresponds to the electronic charge of the species relative to the site that it occupies
While neutral charge (no difference) is usually an $x$, I have always worked with a slash $/$ or similar for one negative charge and a dot $\bullet$ for one positive charge.
I have run across a notation in a teacher's lecture material that says:
$$\ce{Zn^{/}_{Zn}} \quad \text{ and } \quad \ce{Zn^{\bullet}_{Zn}}$$
As I understand it, adding a $\ce{Zn}$ to it's own natural position makes no charge change, so it should be $\ce{Zn^{x}_{Zn}}$. How is the above notation then possible? Does it imply that the $\ce{Zn}$ has lost or gained one electron, respectivily, and thus has a net charge?