This is a mechanism provided in a problem set in my ochem course.
As far as I know, double bond is electron rich, which is nucleophilic and attacks electrophilic species. In this case, why does one double bond attack another carbon in double bond?
This is a mechanism provided in a problem set in my ochem course.
As far as I know, double bond is electron rich, which is nucleophilic and attacks electrophilic species. In this case, why does one double bond attack another carbon in double bond?
Several points about the question itself. First, the enamine of n-butyraldehyde is unquestionably of the (E)-configuration and its preparation does not require an acid catalyst. Mannich[1] prepared 1,1-dipiperidinobutane (1,1'-(butane-1,1-diyl)dipiperidine) from piperidine and n-butyraldehyde in the presence of potassium carbonate. Elimination to the enamine and piperidine occurred upon distillation. Secondly, the enamine employed in the allylation is that of propionaldehyde.
Whether or not $\ce{S_N2 or S_N2'}$ allylation occurs is not straightforward. N-Allylation may be kinetically favored over direct C-allylation. Stork, et al.[2] have noted that Cope rearrangement of the N-allylated product leads to a C-allylation aldehyde which would, if C-allylation were kinetically favored, lead to allylation at the more hindered end of the allylic electrophile. The following is from the Stork paper: