6
$\begingroup$

Problem

$\ce{Cu}$ reacts with $\ce{HNO3}$ according to the equation

$$\ce{Cu + HNO3 -> Cu(NO3)2 + NO + NO2 + H2O}$$

If $\ce{NO}$ and $\ce{NO2}$ are formed in 2:3 ratio, what is coefficient of $\ce{Cu}$ when equation is balanced with simplest whole numbers?

Answer

9

Question

I am getting the coefficient of $\ce{Cu}$ as $2,$ which contradicts the answer:

$$\ce{2 Cu + 9 HNO3 + 5 H+ -> 2 Cu(NO3)2 + 2 NO + 3 NO2 + 7 H2O}$$

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What keeps you from providing your solution ? If you do not show what you did, others cannot tell what you did right or wrong. $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Apr 20, 2021 at 4:26
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ For eventual writing and formatting of chemical or mathematical formulas or equations, see how to use MathJax with mhchem $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Apr 20, 2021 at 4:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ n * 2 = 2m * 3 + 3m * 1 = m * 9 // n=9 versus m=2 // 9 Cu versus 4 NO + 6 NO2 // 18e versus 12e + 6e $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Apr 20, 2021 at 4:43
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please edit the question to include the balanced equation which lead you to believe that the answer is 6. This insight might help us to find your mistake. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 20, 2021 at 4:53
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Who would have thought that hannah montana left their singing career and is now doing chemistr $\endgroup$
    – Brian
    Commented Apr 20, 2021 at 5:10

2 Answers 2

10
$\begingroup$

The final arbiter of formal correctness of chemical reaction enumeration are laws of mass and charge conservation. If total counts of charge and atoms of every element are not the same on each side, the equation is wrong. Reaction enumeration by following these laws may be troublesome, as general solution leads to resolving a set of linear equations. That can be useful for educational purposes, or rather to implant terror and despair in eyes of young chemistry students.

Chemists do not go that way. They usually use various heuristics to speed up the process, enumerating equations in several steps. For redox reactions, the heuristic is inventory of exchanged electrons, which is tracked by formal oxidation numbers (ON). These numbers are rather just arbitrary convention, but extremely useful.

For enumeration of your reaction ( with expressed ONs of relevant atoms):

$$\ce{Cu^{0} + HN^{+V}O3 -> Cu^{+II}(N^{+V}O3)2 + N^{+II}O + N^{+IV}O2 + H2O}$$

the first step is matching components undergoing redox change.

  • Copper changes ON from 0 to +II.i.e. by 2.
  • Nitrogen changes ON from +V to +IV ( $\ce{NO2}$), or from +V to +II($\ce{NO}$), i.e. by 1 resp. 3.
  • There is given $\ce{NO/NO2}$ ratio 2:3, so there would be as products $\ce{2 NO + 3 NO2}$, or their multiples.
  • $\ce{2 NO}$ exchange $2 \cdot 3 = 6$ electrons.
  • $\ce{3 NO2}$ exchange $3 \cdot 1 = 3$ electrons.

For simplicity, we can take formally $\ce{2 NO + 3 NO2}$ as a single entity, created from $\ce{HNO3}$ by exchanging totally 9 electrons.

Now comes the "magical" formula $9 \cdot 2 = 2 \cdot 9$.

9 Cu exchanging 2 electrons each gives 18 electrons totally.
2 ( $\ce{2 NO + 3 NO2}$ ) exchanging 9 electrons each has accepted 18 electrons.

So the intermediate result is: $$\ce{9 Cu + HNO3 -> 9 Cu(NO3)2 + 4 NO + 6 NO2 + H2O}$$

This is enough for the question answer, but we have to finish the equation. It may sometimes happen some coefficients would get fractional, so all would get multiplied to have all integer.

We need supply enough nitrogen for the salt and oxides: $2\cdot 9 + 4 + 6 = 28$ $$\ce{9 Cu + 28 HNO3 -> 9 Cu(NO3)2 + 4 NO + 6 NO2 + H2O}$$

We need to create water from hydrogens: $$\ce{9 Cu + 28 HNO3 -> 9 Cu(NO3)2 + 4 NO + 6 NO2 + 14 H2O}$$

And we are done. We can formally check the item conservation:

$\ce{Cu}$: $9=9$
$\ce{H}$: $28=28$
$\ce{N}$: $28=28$
$\ce{O}$: $3\cdot 28=84=54+4+12+14=84$
charge: $0=0$

For a quick check,we may just check items we were not enumerating before, like just oxygen and charge.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for detailed answer, I got where I went wrong I have $\ce{5H+}$ on LHS I.e +5e charge, but on RHS charge is 0, right ! $\endgroup$
    – Rover
    Commented Apr 20, 2021 at 7:13
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Always include in questions the procedure leading to the questioned result. Without it, it is hard to help. $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Apr 20, 2021 at 7:18
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ This is an interesting reaction for without specifying the ratio of NO to NO2 there are essentially an infinite number of solutions. So just for interest if a 1:1 ratio is needed then the coefficients are 2 , 6 , 2 , 1, 1, 3, in the order above, a ratio of 9:1 NO:NO2 the coefficients are 14 , 38, 14, 9, 1, 19 and 1:9 are 6, 22 , 6, 1 , 9 , 11 so more nitric acid relative to Cu favours NO2 production. $\endgroup$
    – porphyrin
    Commented Apr 21, 2021 at 17:15
5
$\begingroup$

As @Poutnik has already very well described the intuitive way to solve such problem so I will try to describe a standard method for such problems.

First analyse the reaction and find out the species which are being oxidised and reduced by finding the change in their oxidation state. Initially ignore all other ions which are not included in the redox reaction.

In this reaction copper is being oxidised from its $0$ state to $+2$ state. Whereas the nitrate ion is being reduced to it's $+4$ and $+2$ states from its $+5$ state.

Now try to form half cell reactions for the oxidation and reduction parts of the reaction.

In this example oxidation of copper and reduction of nitrate can be described as follows:

$$ \ce{Cu -> Cu^{2+} + 2e-}\\ \ce{3(NO3- + e^-) + 2(NO3- + 3e^-) + 14H+ -> 3NO2 + 2NO + 7H2O} $$

Note, I have used coefficients $3$ and $2$ in the reduction half cell as the question clearly states that $\ce{NO2}$ and $\ce{NO}$ are produced in the ratio of $3:2$.

Now add these half reactions by multiplying them with coefficients in such a way that there is no net electron gain or deficit.

In this case the coefficients or as @Poutnik says magic numbers/components of magic equation are $9$ and $2$.

Multiplying the half reactions with "magic numbers" and than adding them gives the following balanced ionic reaction:

$$\ce{9Cu + 10NO3- + 28H+ -> 9Cu^{2+} + 6NO2 + 4NO + 14H2O}$$

Now to get the molecular reaction we can add $\ce{18NO3-}$ ions to the reaction to form $\ce{HNO3}$ and $\ce{Cu(NO3)2}$ respectively.

This gives us the final equation:

$$\ce{9Cu + 28HNO3 -> 9Cu(NO3)2 + 6NO2 + 4NO + 14H2O}$$

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.